Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
X6

Insta360

X6

Flagship 8K 360 camera with dual Sony 1/1.1-inch square sensors, native 8K50 and in-camera Dolby Vision, 120MP stills, 2.32-inch OLED, 140-minute 8K30 runtime, and 20m waterproofing.

$700

Launch price

Released Aug 2026

vs

Ricoh

WG-1000

Entry rugged waterproof compact with 16.35MP sensor, 4x 27-108mm equivalent zoom, USB-C, and simple controls.

$229

Launch price

Released Jun 2024

X6 is 2.2 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

6categories

X6

Sports & ActionTravel

Wins

1categories

WG-1000

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

X6 wins 4 categories·WG-1000 wins 1 categories
  • BWG-1000 has higher AF points / zones (9 vs 0)
  • AX6 has higher Resolution (120 MP vs 16.35 MP)
  • AX6 has higher 1080p max frame rate (120 fps vs 30 fps)
  • AX6 has higher ISO max (native) (6,400 vs 3,200)
  • AX6 has higher Battery life (CIPA) (520 shots vs 300 shots)

Key specs at a glance

X6WG-1000
Resolution120 MP16.35 MP
Sensor1/1.1"1/2.3 inch
ISO max6,4003,200
Burst30 fps
4K120 fps
IBISNoNo
Weight196 g220 g
Battery520 shots300 shots

Size and weight, to scale

X6 front view

X6

50 × 100 × 40 mm

196 g (0.43 lb / 6.91 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

WG-1000

116 × 69 × 51 mm

220 g (0.49 lb / 7.76 oz)

X6 is 66mm narrower and 11mm thinner than WG-1000 but it is also 32mm taller.

X6 is 24 g lighter than WG-1000.

Depth (front-to-back): 40mm X6 · 51mm WG-1000

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

X6 back view

X6

50 × 100 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

WG-1000

116 × 69 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

X6 top view

X6

50 × 40 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

WG-1000

116 × 51 mm

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseX6WG-1000
Portrait
3.0Limited✓ wins
1.0Limited
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
1.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good✓ wins
1.0Limited
Landscape
5.0Fair✓ wins
1.5Limited
Travel
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
5.5Fair✓ wins
1.5Limited
Vlogging
3.5Limited✓ wins
2.5Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

X6

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265

  • Stabilization modes

    Adds FlowState, 360° Horizon Lock, InstaFrame 2.0…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 50, 100, 40

  • Card types

    Adds microSD

  • Resolution

    120 MP vs 16.35 MP — higher is better

  • 1080p max frame rate

    120 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Object

  • ISO max (native)

    6,400 vs 3,200 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

WG-1000

  • AF points / zones

    9 vs 0 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 116, 68.5, 50.5

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • Card slotsBoth 1

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

X6

Pros

  • Dual Sony 1/1.1-inch sensors (1-inch equivalent 360)
  • Native 8K50 + in-camera Dolby Vision / 10-bit I-Log
  • 120MP 360 photos; 5K60 / 4K120 single-lens
  • 2600mAh Xtreme Battery: 140 min 8K30
  • 20m waterproof + replaceable Lens 2.0

Cons

  • $700 Standard Bundle vs cheaper 360 rivals
  • 8K50, not 8K60 vs Osmo 360 II
  • 47GB usable built-in storage vs DJI 105GB
  • 360 footage still needs reframing

WG-1000

Pros

  • Waterproof and dustproof
  • USB-C
  • Affordable rugged camera
  • 4x optical zoom

Cons

  • Small sensor
  • Full HD only
  • Basic feature set

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the X6 and WG-1000 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

X6
WG-1000
Resolution
120 MP7.3× more
16.35 MP
Sensor type
Dual Sony custom 1/1.1-inch square CMOS (1-inch equivalent 360)
1/2.3" CMOS
Sensor size
1/1.1"
1/2.3 inch
AA filter
No
X6
WG-1000
Aperture
f/2.0
F3.0-F6.6
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
7.78 mm
27-108 mm
X6
WG-1000
Processor
Qualcomm 4nm flagship + dual dedicated AI imaging chips
Image processor
X6
WG-1000
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
6,400+1 stop
3,200
ISO max (expanded)
6,400
3,200
X6
WG-1000
Shutter type
Electronic shutter
Mechanical + electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/4000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/8000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, X6 or WG-1000?

X6 scores 10.0/10 versus 1.5/10 for WG-1000 — 30fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the X6 and WG-1000?

X6 is 120 MP and WG-1000 is 16.35 MP, so the X6 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

How does stabilization compare between the X6 and WG-1000?

X6 uses FlowState 6-axis + 360° Horizon Lock (electronic), while WG-1000 does not have IBIS.

What's the weight difference between the X6 and WG-1000?

X6 weighs 196 g and WG-1000 weighs 220 g, so the X6 is 24 g lighter.

Do the X6 and WG-1000 record 4K video?

X6: 8K 360 (max), 4K up to 120p. WG-1000: Full HD.

Are the X6 and WG-1000 weather sealed?

X6: Yes. WG-1000: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the X6 and 300 shots for the WG-1000, giving the X6 the edge.

How much does each cost?

X6 launched at $700 and WG-1000 at $229. The WG-1000 is $471 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way X6 vs WG-1000 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed September 2026.

Product images courtesy of Insta360 and Ricoh press materials.