Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Blackmagic

Pocket Cinema Camera 4K

Revolutionary affordable MFT cinema camera that democratized BRAW filmmaking.

$1,295

Launch price

Released Sep 2018

vs

Sony

FDR-AX700

4K HDR Handycam with 1-inch Exmor RS sensor, 12x Zeiss zoom, 273-point phase-detect AF, S-Log3, and pro-style manual controls.

$1,899

Launch price

Released Oct 2017

Pocket Cinema Camera 4K is 1 year newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

1categories

Pocket Cinema Camera 4K

WildlifeVideo & Hybrid

Wins

3categories

FDR-AX700

Sports & ActionWildlife

14 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

Pocket Cinema Camera 4K wins 1 categories·FDR-AX700 wins 3 categories
  • BFDR-AX700 has lower AF low-light limit (-4 EV vs 0 EV)
  • BFDR-AX700 has higher AF points / zones (759 vs 0)
  • BFDR-AX700 has higher AF frame coverage (94 % vs 0 %)
  • APocket Cinema Camera 4K has higher Resolution (18.96 MP vs 14.2 MP)

Key specs at a glance

Pocket Cinema Camera 4KFDR-AX700
Resolution18.96 MP14.2 MP
SensorMFTMFT
ISO max25,60025,600
Burst15 fps15 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS6-stop6-stop
Weight580 g580 g
Battery640 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Pocket Cinema Camera 4K

134 × 91 × 72 mm

580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

FDR-AX700

134 × 91 × 72 mm

580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)

Pocket Cinema Camera 4K and FDR-AX700 share virtually identical body dimensions.

Pocket Cinema Camera 4K and FDR-AX700 weigh the same.

Depth (front-to-back): 72mm Pocket Cinema Camera 4K · 72mm FDR-AX700

Sensor size, to scale

Pocket Cinema Camera 4K

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

FDR-AX700

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

Pocket Cinema Camera 4K

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

FDR-AX700: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use casePocket Cinema Camera 4KFDR-AX700
Portrait
4.0Fair
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
6.5Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good
7.5Good
Landscape
3.5Limited
3.5Limited
Travel
7.5Good
7.5Good
Wildlife
8.0Excellent
8.0Excellent
Vlogging
7.0Good
7.0Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Pocket Cinema Camera 4K

  • Resolution

    18.96 MP vs 14.2 MP — higher is better

Reasons to choose

FDR-AX700

  • AF low-light limit

    -4 EV vs 0 EV — lower is better

  • AF points / zones

    759 vs 0 — higher is better

  • AF frame coverage

    94 % vs 0 % — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • ISO max (native)Both 25,600
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (mechanical)Both 6 fps

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Pocket Cinema Camera 4K

Pros

  • Affordable BRAW
  • Great value
  • MFT lens options

Cons

  • No stills AF
  • Crop sensor
  • Screen not tilting

FDR-AX700

Pros

  • 1-inch stacked sensor + Hybrid AF
  • S-Log3 / HLG HDR workflow
  • 12x Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* lens
  • Built-in ND filters
  • Dual SD + proxy recording

Cons

  • No XLR without adapter
  • 4K30 max
  • No SDI output
  • Consumer Handycam ergonomics

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Pocket Cinema Camera 4K and FDR-AX700 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

Pocket Cinema Camera 4K
FDR-AX700
Resolution
18.96 MP+34%
14.2 MP
Sensor type
Four Thirds Live MOS
Four Thirds Live MOS
Sensor size
17.3 × 13.0 mm
17.3 × 13.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
Pocket Cinema Camera 4K
FDR-AX700
Processor
Image processor
BIONZ X
Pocket Cinema Camera 4K
FDR-AX700
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
Pocket Cinema Camera 4K
FDR-AX700
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, Pocket Cinema Camera 4K or FDR-AX700?

FDR-AX700 scores 8.0/10 versus 6.5/10 for Pocket Cinema Camera 4K — 15fps burst — fast action ready.

What's the resolution difference between the Pocket Cinema Camera 4K and FDR-AX700?

Pocket Cinema Camera 4K is 18.96 MP and FDR-AX700 is 14.2 MP, so the Pocket Cinema Camera 4K captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Pocket Cinema Camera 4K and FDR-AX700 have in-body image stabilization?

Pocket Cinema Camera 4K has 6-stop in-body image stabilization, while FDR-AX700 has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Pocket Cinema Camera 4K or the FDR-AX700?

Pocket Cinema Camera 4K reaches 15 fps electronic. FDR-AX700 reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Pocket Cinema Camera 4K and FDR-AX700?

Both bodies weigh roughly 580 g.

Do the Pocket Cinema Camera 4K and FDR-AX700 record 4K video?

Pocket Cinema Camera 4K: 4K up to 60p. FDR-AX700: 4K up to 60p.

Are the Pocket Cinema Camera 4K and FDR-AX700 weather sealed?

Pocket Cinema Camera 4K: Yes. FDR-AX700: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the Pocket Cinema Camera 4K and 640 shots for the FDR-AX700, giving the FDR-AX700 the edge.

How much does each cost?

Pocket Cinema Camera 4K launched at $1,295 and FDR-AX700 at $1,899. The Pocket Cinema Camera 4K is $604 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way Pocket Cinema Camera 4K vs FDR-AX700 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.