Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
Osmo 360 II

DJI

Osmo 360 II

Second-gen 8K 360 director’s camera with dual 1/1.1-inch square sensors, native 8K60, 14.5-stop DR, SuperNight 2.0, user-replaceable lenses, 120MP RAW stills, NFC, and 105GB built-in storage.

$599

Launch price

Released Aug 2026

vs
X half

Fujifilm

X half

Premium vertical-first compact with 1-inch sensor, 32mm f/2.8 lens, 13 Film Simulations, 2-in-1 frame combine, OVF, and instax Link printing.

$850

Launch price

Released Jun 2025

Osmo 360 II is 1.2 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

8categories

Osmo 360 II

Sports & ActionTravel

Wins

1categories

X half

1 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

Osmo 360 II wins 5 categories·X half wins 0 categories
  • AOsmo 360 II has higher Resolution (120 MP vs 17.7 MP)
  • AOsmo 360 II has higher 1080p max frame rate (120 fps vs 24 fps)
  • AOsmo 360 II has higher ISO max (native) (51,200 vs 12,800)
  • AOsmo 360 II has higher RAW buffer depth (200 frames vs 60 frames)
  • AOsmo 360 II has lower ISO min (native) (100 vs 200)

Key specs at a glance

Osmo 360 IIX half
Resolution120 MP17.7 MP
Sensor1/1.1 inch13.3 × 8.8 mm
ISO max51,20012,800
Burst30 fps
4K120 fps
IBISNoNo
Weight183 g240 g
Battery520 shots880 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Osmo 360 II front view

Osmo 360 II

36 × 81 × 61 mm

183 g (0.40 lb / 6.46 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

X half front view

X half

106 × 64 × 46 mm

240 g (0.53 lb / 8.47 oz)

Osmo 360 II is 70mm narrower than X half but it is also 17mm taller and 15mm thicker.

Osmo 360 II is 57 g lighter than X half.

Depth (front-to-back): 61mm Osmo 360 II · 46mm X half

Sensor size, to scale

X half

13.3 × 8.8 mm · 1-inch

117 mm² area

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOsmo 360 IIX half
Portrait
3.0Limited
3.0Limited
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
0.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good✓ wins
1.0Limited
Landscape
5.0Fair✓ wins
0.0Limited
Travel
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
0.0Limited
Vlogging
3.5Limited
3.5Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Osmo 360 II

  • Codecs

    Adds OSV, HEVC

  • Stabilization modes

    Adds RockSteady 3.0, HorizonSteady

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 36.3, 81, 61

  • Card types

    Adds microSD

  • Resolution

    120 MP vs 17.7 MP — higher is better

  • 1080p max frame rate

    120 fps vs 24 fps — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    51,200 vs 12,800 — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    200 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

Reasons to choose

X half

  • Codecs

    Adds H.264 (MOV/MP4)

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 105.8, 64.3, 45.8

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • AA filter

    Only X half supports it

  • Eye AF

    Only X half supports it

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    880 shots vs 520 shots — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Osmo 360 II

Pros

  • Native 8K60 360 + SuperNight 2.0 at 8K60
  • 14.5-stop DR; 10-bit D-Log M
  • User-replaceable hard-coated lenses
  • 120MP HDR panoramas with RAW
  • 105GB built-in storage + NFC tap-to-connect

Cons

  • Single-lens max 4K (no 5K vs first-gen / X6)
  • 100 min 8K30 vs X6’s 140 min
  • 10m waterproof vs X6’s 20m
  • US MSRP/availability still catching China launch (¥3,299)

X half

Pros

  • 1-inch sensor + 32mm f/2.8
  • Vertical 3:4 default + 2-in-1 mode
  • 13 Film Simulations + instax filters
  • Optical viewfinder + 2.4" touchscreen
  • 880 frames per charge (CIPA)

Cons

  • Fixed 32mm lens only
  • JPEG only (no RAW)
  • Full HD video only (no 4K)
  • Premium price for compact
  • Niche half-frame workflow

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Osmo 360 II and X half at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

Osmo 360 II
X half
Resolution
120 MP6.8× more
17.7 MP
Sensor type
Dual 1/1.1-inch square CMOS (1-inch equivalent 360)
1-inch CMOS
Sensor size
1/1.1 inch
13.3 × 8.8 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
Osmo 360 II
X half
Aperture
f/1.9
f/2.8–f/11
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
32 mm
Osmo 360 II
X half
Processor
High-performance ISP
X-Processor 5
Osmo 360 II
X half
ISO min (native)
100−100 less
200
ISO max (native)
51,200+2 stops
12,800
ISO max (expanded)
51,200
102,400
Osmo 360 II
X half
Shutter type
Electronic shutter
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/8000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, Osmo 360 II or X half?

Osmo 360 II scores 10.0/10 versus 0.5/10 for X half — 30fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the Osmo 360 II and X half?

Osmo 360 II is 120 MP and X half is 17.7 MP, so the Osmo 360 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

How does stabilization compare between the Osmo 360 II and X half?

Osmo 360 II uses Electronic image stabilization (electronic), while X half does not have IBIS.

What's the weight difference between the Osmo 360 II and X half?

Osmo 360 II weighs 183 g and X half weighs 240 g, so the Osmo 360 II is 57 g lighter.

Do the Osmo 360 II and X half record 4K video?

Osmo 360 II: 8K 360 (max), 4K up to 120p. X half: Full HD.

Are the Osmo 360 II and X half weather sealed?

Osmo 360 II: Yes. X half: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the Osmo 360 II and 880 shots for the X half, giving the X half the edge.

How much does each cost?

Osmo 360 II launched at $599 and X half at $850. The Osmo 360 II is $251 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way Osmo 360 II vs X half vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed September 2026.

Product images courtesy of DJI and Fujifilm press materials.