Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Fujifilm

GFX100 II

102MP medium format flagship for studio, fashion, and landscape.

$7,499

Launch price

Released Sep 2023

vs

Fujifilm

X-Pro1

The original X-mount rangefinder-style body that launched Fujifilm's interchangeable-lens system.

$1,699

Launch price

Released Jan 2012

GFX100 II is 11.7 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

11categories

GFX100 II

Video & HybridLandscape

Wins

2categories

X-Pro1

3 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

GFX100 II wins 5 categories·X-Pro1 wins 0 categories
  • AGFX100 II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AGFX100 II has higher RAW buffer depth (325 frames vs 11 frames)
  • AGFX100 II has higher Max video bit rate (720 Mbps vs 36 Mbps)
  • AGFX100 II has higher EVF resolution (9,440,000 vs 1,440,000)
  • AGFX100 II has higher Resolution (102 MP vs 16.3 MP)

Key specs at a glance

GFX100 IIX-Pro1
Resolution102 MP16.3 MP
Sensor43.8 x 32.9 mmAPS-C
ISO max12,8006,400
Burst8 fps6 fps
4K60 fps
IBIS8-stopNo
Weight1030 g450 g
Battery540 shots300 shots

Size and weight, to scale

GFX100 II

152 × 117 × 99 mm

1030 g (2.27 lb / 36.33 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

X-Pro1

140 × 82 × 43 mm

450 g (0.99 lb / 15.87 oz)

GFX100 II is 13mm wider, 36mm taller, and 56mm thicker than X-Pro1.

GFX100 II is 580 g heavier than X-Pro1.

Depth (front-to-back): 99mm GFX100 II · 43mm X-Pro1

Sensor size, to scale

GFX100 II

43.8 × 32.9 mm · Medium Format

1441 mm² area

X-Pro1

23.6 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

368 mm² area

3.9× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

GFX100 II: mount data unavailable

X-Pro1

✓ more lenses

Fujifilm X

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseGFX100 IIX-Pro1
Portrait
6.0Good✓ wins
4.5Fair
Sports & Action
5.5Fair✓ wins
2.0Limited
Video & Hybrid
9.0Excellent✓ wins
1.0Limited
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
0.0Limited
Travel
5.0Fair✓ wins
4.0Fair
Wildlife
5.0Fair✓ wins
0.0Limited
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
3.0Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

GFX100 II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Animal, Bird, Automobile…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 152.4, 117.4, 98.6

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II, SSD via USB

  • RAW buffer depth

    325 frames vs 11 frames — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    720 Mbps vs 36 Mbps — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    9,440,000 vs 1,440,000 — higher is better

  • Resolution

    102 MP vs 16.3 MP — higher is better

Reasons to choose

X-Pro1

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 139.5, 81.8, 42.5

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Weight

    450 g vs 1030 g — lower is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    6 fps vs 5.3 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AF points / zonesBoth 425
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • EVF refresh rateBoth 120 Hz
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

GFX100 II

Pros

  • 102MP medium format
  • Stunning detail
  • Pro video

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Large files
  • Slow operation feel

X-Pro1

Pros

  • Historic X-mount launch body
  • Hybrid viewfinder
  • Classic rendering

Cons

  • Very slow by modern standards
  • No 4K
  • Old AF

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the GFX100 II and X-Pro1 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

GFX100 II
X-Pro1
Resolution
102 MP6.3× more
16.3 MP
Sensor type
Medium Format GFX 102MP CMOS II HS
APS-C X-Trans CMOS
Sensor size
43.8 x 32.9 mm
23.6 x 15.6 mm
AA filter
No
No
GFX100 II
X-Pro1
Processor
X-Processor 5
EXR Processor Pro
GFX100 II
X-Pro1
ISO min (native)
80−120 less
200
ISO max (native)
12,800+1 stop
6,400
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
51,200
GFX100 II
X-Pro1
Shutter type
Focal Plane Shutter
Focal Plane Shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/4000 sec
1/4000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/32000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, GFX100 II or X-Pro1?

GFX100 II scores 9.0/10 versus 1.0/10 for X-Pro1 — 8K recording for future-proof footage.

What's the resolution difference between the GFX100 II and X-Pro1?

GFX100 II is 102 MP and X-Pro1 is 16.3 MP, so the GFX100 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the GFX100 II and X-Pro1 have in-body image stabilization?

GFX100 II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while X-Pro1 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the GFX100 II or the X-Pro1?

GFX100 II reaches 8 fps mechanical. X-Pro1 reaches 6 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the GFX100 II and X-Pro1?

GFX100 II weighs 1030 g and X-Pro1 weighs 450 g, so the X-Pro1 is 580 g lighter.

Do the GFX100 II and X-Pro1 record 4K video?

GFX100 II: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p. X-Pro1: Full HD.

Are the GFX100 II and X-Pro1 weather sealed?

GFX100 II: Yes. X-Pro1: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 540 shots (CIPA) for the GFX100 II and 300 shots for the X-Pro1, giving the GFX100 II the edge.

How much does each cost?

GFX100 II launched at $7,499 and X-Pro1 at $1,699. The X-Pro1 is $5,800 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way GFX100 II vs X-Pro1 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.