Fujifilm
GFX100 II
102MP medium format flagship for studio, fashion, and landscape.
$7,499
Released Sep 2023
Fujifilm
X-Pro3
Rangefinder-style APS-C for documentary and street photographers.
$1,799
Released Oct 2019
GFX100 II is 3.9 years newer.
Wins
GFX100 II
Wins
X-Pro3
5 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- AGFX100 II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
- AGFX100 II has higher RAW buffer depth (325 frames vs 17 frames)
- BX-Pro3 has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 5.3 fps)
- AGFX100 II has higher Resolution (102 MP vs 26.1 MP)
- AGFX100 II has higher Max video bit rate (720 Mbps vs 200 Mbps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
GFX100 II
152 × 117 × 99 mm
1030 g (2.27 lb / 36.33 oz)
X-Pro3
141 × 83 × 46 mm
497 g (1.10 lb / 17.53 oz)
GFX100 II is 12mm wider, 35mm taller, and 52mm thicker than X-Pro3.
GFX100 II is 533 g heavier than X-Pro3.
Depth (front-to-back): 99mm GFX100 II · 46mm X-Pro3
Sensor size, to scale
GFX100 II
43.8 × 32.9 mm · Medium Format
1441 mm² area
X-Pro3
23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C
367 mm² area
3.9× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
GFX100 II: mount data unavailable
X-Pro3
✓ more lensesFujifilm X
105+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
GFX100 II
Subject recognition
Adds Animal, Bird, Automobile…
IBIS effectiveness
8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 152.4, 117.4, 98.6
RAW buffer depth
325 frames vs 17 frames — higher is better
Codecs
Adds Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422, Apple ProRes 422 LT…
Resolution
102 MP vs 26.1 MP — higher is better
Max video bit rate
720 Mbps vs 200 Mbps — higher is better
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type B, SSD via USB
Reasons to choose
X-Pro3
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 140.5, 82.8, 46.1
Burst (electronic)
30 fps vs 5.3 fps — higher is better
Weight
497 g vs 1030 g — lower is better
AF low-light limit
-6 EV vs -5.5 EV — lower is better
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Only X-Pro3 supports it
Burst (mechanical)
11 fps vs 8 fps — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓ISO max (native) — Both 12,800
- ✓AF points / zones — Both 425
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Weather sealing — Both support weather sealing
- ✓Card slots — Both 2
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
GFX100 II
Pros
- ✓102MP medium format
- ✓Stunning detail
- ✓Pro video
Cons
- –Very expensive
- –Large files
- –Slow operation feel
X-Pro3
Pros
- ✓Hybrid viewfinder
- ✓Weather sealed
- ✓Classic design
Cons
- –Hidden rear screen divisive
- –26MP
- –Superseded
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for video, GFX100 II or X-Pro3?
GFX100 II scores 9.0/10 versus 3.5/10 for X-Pro3 — 8K recording for future-proof footage.
What's the resolution difference between the GFX100 II and X-Pro3?
GFX100 II is 102 MP and X-Pro3 is 26.1 MP, so the GFX100 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the GFX100 II and X-Pro3 have in-body image stabilization?
GFX100 II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while x-Pro3 does not have IBIS.
Which shoots faster bursts — the GFX100 II or the X-Pro3?
GFX100 II reaches 8 fps mechanical. X-Pro3 reaches 30 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the GFX100 II and X-Pro3?
GFX100 II weighs 1030 g and X-Pro3 weighs 497 g, so the X-Pro3 is 533 g lighter.
Do the GFX100 II and X-Pro3 record 4K video?
GFX100 II: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p. X-Pro3: 4K up to 30p.
Are the GFX100 II and X-Pro3 weather sealed?
GFX100 II: Yes. X-Pro3: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 540 shots (CIPA) for the GFX100 II and 370 shots for the X-Pro3, giving the GFX100 II the edge.
How much does each cost?
GFX100 II launched at $7,499 and X-Pro3 at $1,799. The X-Pro3 is $5,700 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.