Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
X half

Fujifilm

X half

Premium vertical-first compact with 1-inch sensor, 32mm f/2.8 lens, 13 Film Simulations, 2-in-1 frame combine, OVF, and instax Link printing.

$850

Launch price

Released Jun 2025

vs
Luna Ultra

Insta360

Luna Ultra

Flagship dual-lens 3-axis gimbal camera with Leica Summicron 1-inch 8K main lens, 1/1.3-inch telephoto, detachable 2-inch OLED screen, 8K30 / 4K120 video, and 37MP UltraPhoto.

$770

Launch price

Released Jun 2026

Luna Ultra is 1 year newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

2categories

X half

Wins

5categories

Luna Ultra

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

1 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

X half wins 1 categories·Luna Ultra wins 4 categories
  • BLuna Ultra has higher 1080p max frame rate (240 fps vs 24 fps)
  • BLuna Ultra has higher Resolution (37 MP vs 17.7 MP)
  • BLuna Ultra has lower ISO min (native) (100 vs 200)
  • AX half has higher ISO max (native) (12,800 vs 6,400)
  • BLuna Ultra has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 6 stops)

Key specs at a glance

X halfLuna Ultra
Resolution17.7 MP37 MP
Sensor13.3 × 8.8 mm13.2 × 8.8 mm
ISO max12,8006,400
IBISNoNo
Weight240 g233 g
Battery880 shots
4K120 fps

Size and weight, to scale

X half front view

X half

106 × 64 × 46 mm

240 g (0.53 lb / 8.47 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Luna Ultra front view

Luna Ultra

52 × 170 × 39 mm

233 g (0.51 lb / 8.22 oz)

X half is 106mm shorter than Luna Ultra but it is also 53mm wider and 7mm thicker.

X half is 7 g heavier than Luna Ultra.

Depth (front-to-back): 46mm X half · 39mm Luna Ultra

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

X half

106 × 64 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Luna Ultra back view

Luna Ultra

52 × 170 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

X half

106 × 46 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Luna Ultra top view

Luna Ultra

52 × 39 mm

Sensor size, to scale

X half

13.3 × 8.8 mm · 1-inch

117 mm² area

Luna Ultra

13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1-inch

116 mm² area

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseX halfLuna Ultra
Portrait
3.0Limited✓ wins
2.5Limited
Sports & Action
0.5Limited
7.5Good✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
1.0Limited
6.0Good✓ wins
Landscape
0.0Limited
2.0Limited✓ wins
Travel
5.5Fair✓ wins
4.5Fair
Wildlife
0.0Limited
0.0Limited
Vlogging
3.5Limited
4.0Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

X half

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human

  • Codecs

    Adds H.264 (MOV/MP4)

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 105.8, 64.3, 45.8

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • AA filter

    Only X half supports it

  • ISO max (native)

    12,800 vs 6,400 — higher is better

  • Eye AF

    Only X half supports it

  • Max video bit rate

    150 Mbps vs 120 Mbps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Luna Ultra

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 52.4, 169.9, 38.5

  • Card types

    Adds microSD

  • 1080p max frame rate

    240 fps vs 24 fps — higher is better

  • Resolution

    37 MP vs 17.7 MP — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    100 vs 200 — lower is better

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 6 stops — higher is better

  • Weight

    233 g vs 240 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

X half

Pros

  • 1-inch sensor + 32mm f/2.8
  • Vertical 3:4 default + 2-in-1 mode
  • 13 Film Simulations + instax filters
  • Optical viewfinder + 2.4" touchscreen
  • 880 frames per charge (CIPA)

Cons

  • Fixed 32mm lens only
  • JPEG only (no RAW)
  • Full HD video only (no 4K)
  • Premium price for compact
  • Niche half-frame workflow

Luna Ultra

Pros

  • Dual Leica lenses (1" + tele)
  • 8K30 with 4K120 & 1080p240
  • Detachable 2" OLED screen
  • 3-axis gimbal + Deep Track 5.0

Cons

  • Premium vs Pocket 3
  • No waterproofing
  • Tele reach capped at 240mm equiv

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the X half and Luna Ultra at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

X half
Luna Ultra
Resolution
17.7 MP
37 MP2.1× more
Sensor type
1-inch CMOS
1" CMOS main + 1/1.3" tele (Leica Summicron)
Sensor size
13.3 × 8.8 mm
13.2 × 8.8 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
X half
Luna Ultra
Aperture
f/2.8–f/11
f/1.8 main / f/2.0 tele
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
32 mm
20mm main / 60mm tele
X half
Luna Ultra
Processor
X-Processor 5
Triple AI Chip (dual imaging + 4nm AI)
X half
Luna Ultra
ISO min (native)
200
100−100 less
ISO max (native)
12,800+1 stop
6,400
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
6,400
X half
Luna Ultra
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/8000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, X half or Luna Ultra?

Luna Ultra scores 7.5/10 versus 0.5/10 for X half — 3-axis mechanical gimbal — cinema-smooth footage in motion.

What's the resolution difference between the X half and Luna Ultra?

X half is 17.7 MP and Luna Ultra is 37 MP, so the Luna Ultra captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

How does stabilization compare between the X half and Luna Ultra?

X half does not have IBIS, while Luna Ultra uses a 3-axis mechanical gimbal.

What's the weight difference between the X half and Luna Ultra?

X half weighs 240 g and Luna Ultra weighs 233 g, so the Luna Ultra is 7 g lighter.

Do the X half and Luna Ultra record 4K video?

X half: Full HD. Luna Ultra: 8K (7680×4320) (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the X half and Luna Ultra weather sealed?

X half: No. Luna Ultra: No.

How much does each cost?

X half launched at $850 and Luna Ultra at $770. The Luna Ultra is $80 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way X half vs Luna Ultra vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Fujifilm and Insta360 press materials.