Hasselblad
X2D 100C
100MP medium format with 5-axis IBIS and Hasselblad color.
$8,199
Released Jun 2022
OM System
OM-1 II
Flagship MFT with stacked sensor, 120fps, and pro wildlife features.
$2,399
Released Feb 2024
OM-1 II is 1.6 years newer.
Wins
X2D 100C
Wins
OM-1 II
7 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- BOM-1 II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 117)
- AX2D 100C has higher Resolution (100 MP vs 20.4 MP)
- BOM-1 II has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 30 fps)
- BOM-1 II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 51,200)
- AX2D 100C has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
X2D 100C
138 × 98 × 88 mm
720 g (1.59 lb / 25.40 oz)
OM-1 II
135 × 92 × 73 mm
599 g (1.32 lb / 21.13 oz)
X2D 100C is 3mm wider, 6mm taller, and 15mm thicker than OM-1 II.
X2D 100C is 121 g heavier than OM-1 II.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm X2D 100C · 73mm OM-1 II
Sensor size, to scale
X2D 100C
43.8 × 32.9 mm · Medium Format
1441 mm² area
OM-1 II
17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type
226 mm² area
6.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
X2D 100C: mount data unavailable
OM-1 II
✓ more lensesMicro Four Thirds
130+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
X2D 100C
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Animal, Bird…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138, 98, 88
Resolution
100 MP vs 20.4 MP — higher is better
AA filter
Only X2D 100C supports it
Card slots
2 vs 1 — higher is better
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type B
Headphone jack (3.5mm)
Only X2D 100C supports it
ISO min (native)
64 vs 80 — lower is better
Reasons to choose
OM-1 II
AF low-light limit
-8 EV vs -2 EV — lower is better
Subject recognition
Adds People, Birds, Animals…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 134.8, 91.6, 72.7
AF points / zones
1053 vs 117 — higher is better
Burst (electronic)
120 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 51,200 — higher is better
Card types
Adds SD UHS-I
Codecs
Adds MOV
Both cameras share
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Pre-Capture / Pre-Release — Both support pre-capture / pre-release
- ✓4K max frame rate — Both 60 fps
- ✓Max video bit rate — Both 150 Mbps
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
X2D 100C
Pros
- ✓100MP medium format
- ✓IBIS
- ✓Stunning files
Cons
- –Very expensive
- –Slow operation
- –Limited lens line
OM-1 II
Pros
- ✓120fps stills
- ✓Stacked MFT
- ✓IP53 weather sealing
- ✓Computational features
Cons
- –MFT sensor size
- –Smaller ecosystem
- –Menu complexity
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for landscape, X2D 100C or OM-1 II?
X2D 100C scores 8.0/10 versus 2.5/10 for OM-1 II — 100MP — massive detail for large prints.
What's the resolution difference between the X2D 100C and OM-1 II?
X2D 100C is 100 MP and OM-1 II is 20.4 MP, so the X2D 100C captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the X2D 100C and OM-1 II have in-body image stabilization?
X2D 100C has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while oM-1 II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the X2D 100C or the OM-1 II?
X2D 100C reaches 30 fps electronic. OM-1 II reaches 120 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the X2D 100C and OM-1 II?
X2D 100C weighs 720 g and OM-1 II weighs 599 g, so the OM-1 II is 121 g lighter.
Do the X2D 100C and OM-1 II record 4K video?
X2D 100C: 4K up to 60p. OM-1 II: 4K up to 60p.
Are the X2D 100C and OM-1 II weather sealed?
X2D 100C: Yes. OM-1 II: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the X2D 100C and 520 shots for the OM-1 II, giving the OM-1 II the edge.
How much does each cost?
X2D 100C launched at $8,199 and OM-1 II at $2,399. The OM-1 II is $5,800 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.