Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Insta360

Ace Pro 2

8K Leica-lens action camera with 1/1.3-inch sensor, 4K60 Active HDR, PureVideo low-light mode, and 12m waterproofing.

$449

Released Oct 2024

vs

OM System

OM-1 II

Flagship MFT with stacked sensor, 120fps, and pro wildlife features.

$2,399

Released Feb 2024

Ace Pro 2 is 9 months newer.

Wins

4categories

Ace Pro 2

Video & HybridTravel

Wins

6categories

OM-1 II

Sports & ActionTravel

2 categories tied

Check current prices

Search these camera bodies at major authorized retailers to check current discounts, bundled lenses, and certified refurbished deals:

TL;DR — Key differences

Ace Pro 2 wins 2 categories·OM-1 II wins 3 categories
  • BOM-1 II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 0)
  • BOM-1 II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 6,400)
  • BOM-1 II has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 20 fps)
  • AAce Pro 2 has lower Weight (177.2 g vs 599 g)
  • AAce Pro 2 has higher Resolution (50 MP vs 20.4 MP)

Key specs at a glance

Ace Pro 2OM-1 II
Resolution50 MP20.4 MP
Sensor1/1.3 inchMFT
ISO max6,400102,400
Burst20 fps120 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBISNo8.5-stop
Weight177.2 g599 g
Battery640 shots520 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Ace Pro 2

72 × 52 × 38 mm

177.2 g (0.39 lb / 6.25 oz)

OM-1 II

135 × 92 × 73 mm

599 g (1.32 lb / 21.13 oz)

Ace Pro 2 is 63mm narrower, 39mm shorter, and 35mm thinner than OM-1 II.

Ace Pro 2 is 422 g lighter than OM-1 II.

Depth (front-to-back): 38mm Ace Pro 2 · 73mm OM-1 II

Sensor size, to scale

OM-1 II

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

Ace Pro 2: mount data unavailable

OM-1 II

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseAce Pro 2OM-1 II
Portrait
3.0Limited
4.0Fair✓ wins
Sports & Action
5.0Fair
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
7.0Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Landscape
5.0Fair✓ wins
2.5Limited
Travel
7.0Good
7.0Good
Wildlife
5.5Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Vlogging
4.0Fair
7.0Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Ace Pro 2

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 71.9, 52.2, 38

  • Card types

    Adds microSD

  • Weight

    177.2 g vs 599 g — lower is better

  • Resolution

    50 MP vs 20.4 MP — higher is better

  • Internal RAW video

    Only Ace Pro 2 supports it

  • Max video bit rate

    200 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 520 shots — higher is better

Reasons to choose

OM-1 II

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 0 — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Birds, Animals…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134.8, 91.6, 72.7

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-I

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 6,400 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    120 fps vs 20 fps — higher is better

  • Eye AF

    Only OM-1 II supports it

  • Animal / bird AF

    Only OM-1 II supports it

Both cameras share

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Ace Pro 2

Pros

  • 8K30 video
  • 1/1.3-inch Leica lens
  • PureVideo night mode
  • 12m waterproof

Cons

  • 8K drains battery faster
  • Premium vs DJI Action
  • Fixed lens

OM-1 II

Pros

  • 120fps stills
  • Stacked MFT
  • IP53 weather sealing
  • Computational features

Cons

  • MFT sensor size
  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Menu complexity

Full specifications

= category winner

Ace Pro 2
OM-1 II
Resolution
50 MP2.5× more
20.4 MP
Sensor type
1/1.3-inch 8K CMOS (Leica SUMMARIT lens)
4/3 Stacked BSI Live MOS
Sensor size
1/1.3 inch
17.4 x 13.0 mm
AA filter
No
Ace Pro 2
OM-1 II
AF system
Fixed focus
1053-point Cross Quad Pixel phase detection AF
AF points / zones
0
1053
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-8 EV
Eye AF
No
Yes
Animal / bird AF
No
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Birds, Animals, Motorsports, Airplanes, Trains
Ace Pro 2
OM-1 II
Burst (mechanical)
8 fps
10 fps+25%
Burst (electronic)
20 fps
120 fps6× more
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
Yes
RAW buffer depth
120 frames
Ace Pro 2
OM-1 II
Max resolution
8K
4K / C4K
4K max frame rate
60 fps
60 fps
Max video bit rate
200 Mbps+33%
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Standard / Vivid / I-Log
OM-Log / HLG
Codecs
H.264, H.265
H.264, H.265, MOV
Ace Pro 2
OM-1 II
Weight
177.2 g−422 g less
599 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
71.9 × 52.2 × 38 mm
134.8 × 91.6 × 72.7 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, Ace Pro 2 or OM-1 II?

OM-1 II scores 8.5/10 versus 5.0/10 for Ace Pro 2 — 120fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the Ace Pro 2 and OM-1 II?

Ace Pro 2 is 50 MP and OM-1 II is 20.4 MP, so the Ace Pro 2 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Ace Pro 2 and OM-1 II have in-body image stabilization?

Ace Pro 2 does not have IBIS, while oM-1 II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Ace Pro 2 or the OM-1 II?

Ace Pro 2 reaches 20 fps electronic. OM-1 II reaches 120 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Ace Pro 2 and OM-1 II?

Ace Pro 2 weighs 177.2 g and OM-1 II weighs 599 g, so the Ace Pro 2 is 422 g lighter.

Do the Ace Pro 2 and OM-1 II record 4K video?

Ace Pro 2: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p. OM-1 II: 4K up to 60p.

Are the Ace Pro 2 and OM-1 II weather sealed?

Ace Pro 2: Yes. OM-1 II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the Ace Pro 2 and 520 shots for the OM-1 II, giving the Ace Pro 2 the edge.

How much does each cost?

Ace Pro 2 launched at $449 and OM-1 II at $2,399. The Ace Pro 2 is $1,950 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.