Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
GO 3S

Insta360

GO 3S

Thumb-sized 4K POV camera with magnetic mounting, Action Pod remote preview, FlowState stabilization, and 10m waterproof body.

$400

Launch price

Released Jun 2024

vs
X5

Insta360

X5

Flagship 360° action camera with dual 1/1.28-inch sensors, 8K 30fps 360° video, 4K 60fps single-lens mode, 15m waterproofing, and AI-powered PureVideo.

$550

Launch price

Released Apr 2025

X5 is 10 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

1categories

GO 3S

Wins

7categories

X5

Sports & Action

3 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

GO 3S wins 0 categories·X5 wins 5 categories
  • BX5 has higher Battery capacity (2400 mAh vs 310 mAh)
  • BX5 has higher Resolution (72 MP vs 12 MP)
  • BX5 has higher Battery runtime (135 min vs 38 min)
  • BX5 has higher 1080p max frame rate (120 fps vs 50 fps)
  • BX5 has higher ISO max (native) (6,400 vs 3,200)

Key specs at a glance

GO 3SX5
Resolution12 MP72 MP
Sensor1/2.3 inch1/1.28"
ISO max3,2006,400
4K30 fps60 fps
IBISNoNo
Weight135.4 g200 g

Size and weight, to scale

GO 3S front view

GO 3S

54 × 25 × 26 mm

135.4 g (0.30 lb / 4.78 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

X5 front view

X5

46 × 125 × 38 mm

200 g (0.44 lb / 7.05 oz)

GO 3S is 100mm shorter and 13mm thinner than X5 but it is also 8mm wider.

GO 3S is 65 g lighter than X5.

Depth (front-to-back): 26mm GO 3S · 38mm X5

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

GO 3S back view

GO 3S

54 × 25 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

X5 back view

X5

46 × 125 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

GO 3S top view

GO 3S

54 × 26 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

X5 top view

X5

46 × 38 mm

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseGO 3SX5
Portrait
1.0Limited
3.0Limited✓ wins
Sports & Action
4.0Fair
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
1.5Limited
5.5Fair✓ wins
Landscape
1.5Limited
5.0Fair✓ wins
Travel
5.0Fair
5.0Fair
Wildlife
1.5Limited
1.5Limited
Vlogging
3.0Limited
4.0Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

GO 3S

  • Codecs

    Adds H.264/AVC

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 54.4, 24.8, 25.6

  • Stabilization modes

    Adds Horizon Lock

  • Weight

    135.4 g vs 200 g — lower is better

Reasons to choose

X5

  • Codecs

    Adds H.264, H.265

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 46, 124.5, 38.2

  • Battery capacity

    2400 mAh vs 310 mAh — higher is better

  • Resolution

    72 MP vs 12 MP — higher is better

  • Stabilization modes

    Adds Horizon Lock 360°, Active HDR, PureVideo

  • Battery runtime

    135 min vs 38 min — higher is better

  • 1080p max frame rate

    120 fps vs 50 fps — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    6,400 vs 3,200 — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

GO 3S

Pros

  • 4K30 in a 39g body
  • Action Pod with 2.2-inch flip screen
  • FlowState + Horizon Lock
  • 10m waterproof (camera only)
  • 140 min runtime with Action Pod

Cons

  • Tiny 1/2.3-inch sensor
  • Fixed 16mm lens
  • Action Pod not waterproof
  • Built-in storage only (64/128GB)

X5

Pros

  • Dual 1/1.28-inch sensors (2× larger than X4)
  • 8K 30fps 360° and 5.7K 60fps
  • 4K 60fps single-lens action mode
  • 15m waterproof without case
  • 72MP 360° photos

Cons

  • Premium price vs X4
  • 8K workflow is storage-heavy
  • Fixed lenses (not user-swappable in field)
  • Editing 360° footage takes time

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the GO 3S and X5 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

GO 3S
X5
Resolution
12 MP
72 MP6× more
Sensor type
CMOS
Dual 1/1.28" CMOS (360°)
Sensor size
1/2.3 inch
1/1.28"
AA filter
No
No
GO 3S
X5
Aperture
2.8
f/2.0
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
16
6 mm per lens
GO 3S
X5
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
3,200
6,400+1 stop
ISO max (expanded)
3,200
6,400
GO 3S
X5
Shutter type
Electronic shutter
Electronic shutter
Max electronic speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, GO 3S or X5?

X5 scores 8.5/10 versus 4.0/10 for GO 3S — Weather sealed for outdoor sports.

What's the resolution difference between the GO 3S and X5?

GO 3S is 12 MP and X5 is 72 MP, so the X5 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

How does stabilization compare between the GO 3S and X5?

GO 3S does not have IBIS, while X5 uses FlowState 6-axis (electronic).

What's the weight difference between the GO 3S and X5?

GO 3S weighs 135.4 g and X5 weighs 200 g, so the GO 3S is 65 g lighter.

Do the GO 3S and X5 record 4K video?

GO 3S: 4K up to 30p. X5: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p.

Are the GO 3S and X5 weather sealed?

GO 3S: Yes. X5: Yes.

Which has better battery runtime?

GO 3S is rated for about 38 minutes of continuous recording and X5 for about 135 minutes, giving the X5 the edge.

How much does each cost?

GO 3S launched at $400 and X5 at $550. The GO 3S is $150 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way GO 3S vs X5 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Insta360 press materials.