Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

OM System

OM-1 II

Flagship MFT with stacked sensor, 120fps, and pro wildlife features.

$2,399

Launch price

Released Feb 2024

vs

OM System

PEN-F

Retro-styled MFT rangefinder body with 20MP sensor, built-in EVF, and classic dial controls.

$1,199

Launch price

Released Jan 2016

OM-1 II is 8 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

8categories

OM-1 II

Sports & ActionTravel

Wins

3categories

PEN-F

Sports & ActionVlogging

6 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

OM-1 II wins 4 categories·PEN-F wins 1 categories
  • AOM-1 II has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 15 fps)
  • AOM-1 II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
  • AOM-1 II has higher EVF resolution (5,760,000 vs 2,360,000)
  • BPEN-F has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)
  • AOM-1 II has higher Burst (mechanical) (10 fps vs 6 fps)

Key specs at a glance

OM-1 IIPEN-F
Resolution20.4 MP20.3 MP
SensorMFTMFT
ISO max102,40025,600
Burst120 fps15 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS8.5-stop6-stop
Weight599 g427 g
Battery520 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

OM-1 II

135 × 92 × 73 mm

599 g (1.32 lb / 21.13 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

PEN-F

125 × 72 × 37 mm

427 g (0.94 lb / 15.06 oz)

OM-1 II is 10mm wider, 20mm taller, and 35mm thicker than PEN-F.

OM-1 II is 172 g heavier than PEN-F.

Depth (front-to-back): 73mm OM-1 II · 37mm PEN-F

Sensor size, to scale

OM-1 II

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

PEN-F

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

OM-1 II

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

PEN-F

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOM-1 IIPEN-F
Portrait
4.0Fair
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Video & Hybrid
5.5Fair
6.0Good✓ wins
Landscape
2.5Limited✓ wins
2.0Limited
Travel
7.0Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Wildlife
6.5Good
6.5Good
Vlogging
7.0Good
7.5Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

OM-1 II

  • AF low-light limit

    -8 EV vs -7 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Birds, Animals…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134.8, 91.6, 72.7

  • Burst (electronic)

    120 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • Weather sealing

    Only OM-1 II supports it

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

Reasons to choose

PEN-F

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 124.8, 72.1, 37.3

  • Card slots

    2 vs 1 — higher is better

  • Headphone jack (3.5mm)

    Only PEN-F supports it

  • Weight

    427 g vs 599 g — lower is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 520 shots — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AF points / zonesBoth 1053
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

OM-1 II

Pros

  • 120fps stills
  • Stacked MFT
  • IP53 weather sealing
  • Computational features

Cons

  • MFT sensor size
  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Menu complexity

PEN-F

Pros

  • Beautiful retro design
  • Built-in EVF
  • 20MP MFT
  • Creative dial modes

Cons

  • No IBIS
  • MFT sensor
  • Discontinued

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the OM-1 II and PEN-F at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

OM-1 II
PEN-F
Resolution
20.4 MP
20.3 MP
Sensor type
4/3 Stacked BSI Live MOS
Four Thirds Live MOS
Sensor size
17.4 x 13.0 mm
17.3 × 13.0 mm
AA filter
No
No
OM-1 II
PEN-F
Processor
TruePic X
TruePic X
OM-1 II
PEN-F
ISO min (native)
80−20 less
100
ISO max (native)
102,400+2 stops
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
OM-1 II
PEN-F
Shutter type
Computerised focal-plane shutter + electronic shutter
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, OM-1 II or PEN-F?

OM-1 II scores 10.0/10 versus 7.5/10 for PEN-F — 120fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the OM-1 II and PEN-F?

OM-1 II is 20.4 MP and PEN-F is 20.3 MP, so the OM-1 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the OM-1 II and PEN-F have in-body image stabilization?

OM-1 II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while PEN-F has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the OM-1 II or the PEN-F?

OM-1 II reaches 120 fps electronic. PEN-F reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the OM-1 II and PEN-F?

OM-1 II weighs 599 g and PEN-F weighs 427 g, so the PEN-F is 172 g lighter.

Do the OM-1 II and PEN-F record 4K video?

OM-1 II: 4K up to 60p. PEN-F: 4K up to 60p.

Are the OM-1 II and PEN-F weather sealed?

OM-1 II: Yes. PEN-F: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the OM-1 II and 640 shots for the PEN-F, giving the PEN-F the edge.

How much does each cost?

OM-1 II launched at $2,399 and PEN-F at $1,199. The PEN-F is $1,200 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way OM-1 II vs PEN-F vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.