Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

OM System

OM-1 II

Flagship MFT with stacked sensor, 120fps, and pro wildlife features.

$2,399

Launch price

Released Feb 2024

vs

Xtra

Atto

Ultra-compact 54g wearable action camera with 1/1.3-inch sensor, 4K/60fps, 143° FOV, 128GB internal storage, and 220-min battery with Vision Dock.

$299

Launch price

Released Jan 2026

Atto is 2 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

5categories

OM-1 II

Sports & ActionTravel

Wins

2categories

Atto

Travel

1 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

OM-1 II wins 4 categories·Atto wins 1 categories
  • AOM-1 II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 0)
  • AOM-1 II has higher Card slots (1 vs 0)
  • AOM-1 II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 6,400)
  • BAtto has lower Weight (54 g vs 599 g)
  • AOM-1 II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8.5 stops vs 6 stops)

Key specs at a glance

OM-1 IIAtto
Resolution20.4 MP
SensorMFT9.6 × 7.2 mm
ISO max102,4006,400
Burst120 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS8.5-stopNo
Weight599 g54 g
Battery520 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

OM-1 II

135 × 92 × 73 mm

599 g (1.32 lb / 21.13 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

OM-1 II is 545 g heavier than Atto.

Depth (front-to-back): 73mm OM-1 II

Sensor size, to scale

OM-1 II

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

Atto

9.6 × 7.2 mm · Compact

69 mm² area

3.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

OM-1 II

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Atto: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOM-1 IIAtto
Portrait
4.0Fair✓ wins
1.0Limited
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
5.0Fair
Video & Hybrid
5.5Fair✓ wins
4.0Fair
Landscape
2.5Limited✓ wins
1.5Limited
Travel
7.0Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
3.0Limited
Vlogging
7.0Good✓ wins
4.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

OM-1 II

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 0 — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Birds, Animals…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134.8, 91.6, 72.7

  • Card slots

    1 vs 0 — higher is better

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-I

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 6,400 — higher is better

  • Eye AF

    Only OM-1 II supports it

  • Animal / bird AF

    Only OM-1 II supports it

Reasons to choose

Atto

  • Stabilization modes

    Adds MotionMaster, TiltGuard

  • Card types

    Adds microSD (via Vision Dock)

  • Weight

    54 g vs 599 g — lower is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 520 shots — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

OM-1 II

Pros

  • 120fps stills
  • Stacked MFT
  • IP53 weather sealing
  • Computational features

Cons

  • MFT sensor size
  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Menu complexity

Atto

Pros

  • 54g lightest in class
  • 220 min with Vision Dock
  • 128GB built-in + 600MB/s transfer
  • 5-min pre-recording

Cons

  • No built-in screen
  • 4K/60fps 16:9 only
  • 10m waterproof (no case)

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the OM-1 II and Atto at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

OM-1 II
Atto
Resolution
20.4 MP
Sensor type
4/3 Stacked BSI Live MOS
1/1.3" CMOS
Sensor size
17.4 x 13.0 mm
9.6 × 7.2 mm
AA filter
No
OM-1 II
Atto
Field of view
143 °
OM-1 II
Atto
Processor
TruePic X
Xtra AI processor
OM-1 II
Atto
ISO min (native)
80−20 less
100
ISO max (native)
102,400+4 stops
6,400
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
6,400
OM-1 II
Atto
Shutter type
Computerised focal-plane shutter + electronic shutter
Electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/8000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, OM-1 II or Atto?

OM-1 II scores 10.0/10 versus 5.0/10 for Atto — 120fps burst — pro-level action capture.

Do the OM-1 II and Atto have in-body image stabilization?

OM-1 II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while Atto uses Electronic stabilization (MotionMaster + TiltGuard) (electronic).

What's the weight difference between the OM-1 II and Atto?

OM-1 II weighs 599 g and Atto weighs 54 g, so the Atto is 545 g lighter.

Do the OM-1 II and Atto record 4K video?

OM-1 II: 4K up to 60p. Atto: 4K up to 60p.

Are the OM-1 II and Atto weather sealed?

OM-1 II: Yes. Atto: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the OM-1 II and 640 shots for the Atto, giving the Atto the edge.

How much does each cost?

OM-1 II launched at $2,399 and Atto at $299. The Atto is $2,100 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way OM-1 II vs Atto vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.