Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

OM System

OM-D E-M1

Original pro MFT body that established Olympus as a serious wildlife and macro system.

$1,399

Launch price

Released Sep 2013

vs
Alpha 7 V

Sony

Alpha 7 V

33MP partially stacked Exmor RS hybrid with BIONZ XR2 AI, 30fps blackout-free burst, 7.5-stop IBIS, and 4K 60p oversampled from 7K.

$2,899

Launch price

Released Dec 2025

Alpha 7 V is 12.2 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

7categories

OM-D E-M1

WildlifeSports & Action

Wins

7categories

Alpha 7 V

WildlifeSports & Action

4 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

OM-D E-M1 wins 1 categories·Alpha 7 V wins 4 categories
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher Resolution (33 MP vs 16.3 MP)
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher ISO max (native) (51,200 vs 25,600)
  • BAlpha 7 V has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)
  • AOM-D E-M1 has lower Weight (443 g vs 695 g)

Key specs at a glance

OM-D E-M1Alpha 7 V
Resolution16.3 MP33 MP
SensorMFTFull Frame
ISO max25,60051,200
Burst20 fps30 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBIS7-stop7.5-stop
Weight443 g695 g
Battery640 shots630 shots

Size and weight, to scale

OM-D E-M1

147 × 94 × 82 mm

443 g (0.98 lb / 15.63 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 7 V front view

Alpha 7 V

130 × 96 × 82 mm

695 g (1.53 lb / 24.52 oz)

OM-D E-M1 is 3mm shorter than Alpha 7 V but it is also 17mm wider.

OM-D E-M1 is 252 g lighter than Alpha 7 V.

Depth (front-to-back): 82mm OM-D E-M1 · 82mm Alpha 7 V

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

OM-D E-M1

147 × 94 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7 V back view

Alpha 7 V

130 × 96 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

OM-D E-M1

147 × 82 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7 V top view

Alpha 7 V

130 × 82 mm

Sensor size, to scale

OM-D E-M1

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

Alpha 7 V

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

OM-D E-M1

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Alpha 7 V

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOM-D E-M1Alpha 7 V
Portrait
4.0Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
3.5Limited
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
8.0Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Wildlife
9.0Excellent
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
7.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

OM-D E-M1

  • AF low-light limit

    -7 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 146.8, 93.6, 82.1

  • Weight

    443 g vs 695 g — lower is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 759 — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Vehicle

  • RAW buffer depth

    120 frames vs 95 frames — higher is better

  • AF frame coverage

    100 % vs 94 % — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 630 shots — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7 V

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 130.3, 96.4, 82.4

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Insect, Car, Train…

  • Resolution

    33 MP vs 16.3 MP — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    51,200 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • Internal RAW video

    Only Alpha 7 V supports it

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

OM-D E-M1

Pros

  • Pro build
  • Weather sealed
  • Fast AF for era
  • Compact pro system

Cons

  • 16MP dated
  • Superseded
  • MFT limits

Alpha 7 V

Pros

  • 33MP partially stacked sensor — ~4.5× faster readout than α7 IV
  • Blackout-free 30 fps with full AF/AE (electronic shutter)
  • 7.5-stop central / 6.5-stop peripheral IBIS (CIPA 2024)
  • 759-point phase-detect AF down to EV -4 with AI subject recognition
  • 7K oversampled 4K 60p (full-frame, no pixel binning) + 4K 120p
  • Pre-Capture and dual USB-C (10 Gbps + USB 2.0)
  • Up to 16 stops dynamic range

Cons

  • Premium price vs α7 IV
  • 4K 120p typically requires APS-C / Super 35 crop
  • Heavier than α7 IV (695 g vs 659 g with battery)
  • Complex menu and feature set

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the OM-D E-M1 and Alpha 7 V at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

OM-D E-M1
Alpha 7 V
Resolution
16.3 MP
33 MP2× more
Sensor type
Four Thirds Live MOS
Full Frame Exmor RS CMOS (partially stacked)
Sensor size
17.3 × 13.0 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
OM-D E-M1
Alpha 7 V
Processor
TruePic X
BIONZ XR2 + AI processing unit
OM-D E-M1
Alpha 7 V
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600
51,200+1 stop
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
204,800
OM-D E-M1
Alpha 7 V
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, OM-D E-M1 or Alpha 7 V?

Alpha 7 V scores 8.0/10 versus 4.0/10 for OM-D E-M1 — 33MP — ample resolution for portraits.

What's the resolution difference between the OM-D E-M1 and Alpha 7 V?

OM-D E-M1 is 16.3 MP and Alpha 7 V is 33 MP, so the Alpha 7 V captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the OM-D E-M1 and Alpha 7 V have in-body image stabilization?

OM-D E-M1 has 7-stop in-body image stabilization, while Alpha 7 V has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the OM-D E-M1 or the Alpha 7 V?

OM-D E-M1 reaches 20 fps electronic. Alpha 7 V reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the OM-D E-M1 and Alpha 7 V?

OM-D E-M1 weighs 443 g and Alpha 7 V weighs 695 g, so the OM-D E-M1 is 252 g lighter.

Do the OM-D E-M1 and Alpha 7 V record 4K video?

OM-D E-M1: 4K up to 60p. Alpha 7 V: 4K up to 120p.

Are the OM-D E-M1 and Alpha 7 V weather sealed?

OM-D E-M1: Yes. Alpha 7 V: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the OM-D E-M1 and 630 shots for the Alpha 7 V, giving the OM-D E-M1 the edge.

How much does each cost?

OM-D E-M1 launched at $1,399 and Alpha 7 V at $2,899. The OM-D E-M1 is $1,500 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way OM-D E-M1 vs Alpha 7 V vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of OM System and Sony press materials.