Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Panasonic

AG-CX350

Broadcast 4K camcorder with 1-inch 15MP MOS sensor, 20x zoom, 10-bit ALL-Intra/HEVC, HLG, 3G-SDI, dual XLR, and NDI|HX option.

$5,995

Launch price

Released Sep 2019

vs

Panasonic

HC-X2100

Compact 4K60p/10-bit HEVC camcorder with 1/2.5-inch MOS sensor, 24x 25–600mm zoom, face-detection AF, USB-PD, and live streaming.

$3,699

Launch price

Released Nov 2020

HC-X2100 is 1.2 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

9categories

AG-CX350

★ Sports & Action★ Wildlife

Wins

1categories

HC-X2100

★ Wildlife★ Sports & Action

8 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

AG-CX350 wins 5 categories·HC-X2100 wins 0 categories
  • AAG-CX350 has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 200 Mbps)
  • AAG-CX350 has higher ISO max (native) (51,200 vs 25,600)
  • AAG-CX350 has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)
  • AAG-CX350 has higher Resolution (15 MP vs 8.29 MP)
  • AAG-CX350 has higher RAW buffer depth (200 frames vs 120 frames)

Key specs at a glance

AG-CX350HC-X2100
Resolution15 MP8.29 MP
SensorMFTMFT
ISO max51,20025,600
Burst30 fps20 fps
4K120 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stop7-stop
Weight580 g580 g
Battery520 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

AG-CX350

134 × 91 × 72 mm

580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

HC-X2100

134 × 91 × 72 mm

580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)

AG-CX350 and HC-X2100 share virtually identical body dimensions.

AG-CX350 and HC-X2100 weigh the same.

Depth (front-to-back): 72mm AG-CX350 · 72mm HC-X2100

Sensor size, to scale

AG-CX350

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

HC-X2100

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseAG-CX350HC-X2100
Portrait
4.0Fair
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Video & Hybrid
9.5Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Landscape
3.5Limited
3.5Limited
Travel
7.0Good
7.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
10.0Excellent✓ wins
9.0Excellent
Vlogging
7.0Good
7.0Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

AG-CX350

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 200 Mbps — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    51,200 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B

  • Resolution

    15 MP vs 8.29 MP — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    200 frames vs 120 frames — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 8 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

HC-X2100

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 520 shots — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ✓AA filter — Both support aa filter
  • ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
  • ✓AF points / zones — Both 225
  • ✓AF frame coverage — Both 90 %
  • ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
  • ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

AG-CX350

Pros

  • ✓1-inch 15MP MOS (2000 TV lines)
  • ✓4K 10-bit ALL-Intra & HEVC LongG
  • ✓3G-SDI + dual XLR + genlock/timecode
  • ✓Built-in ND + IR cut filter
  • ✓HLG / V-Log L compatible workflow

Cons

  • –Heavy at 1.9 kg body-only
  • –Premium broadcast pricing
  • –Fixed 20x lens
  • –NDI requires optional license

HC-X2100

Pros

  • ✓4K 60p 10-bit HEVC internal
  • ✓24x 25–600mm f/1.8–4.0 zoom
  • ✓Face Detection AF/AE
  • ✓USB-PD power + long battery life
  • ✓Detachable XLR handle unit

Cons

  • –1/2.5-inch sensor
  • –No SDI output
  • –Smaller sensor than AG-CX350
  • –Pro features need handle unit

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the AG-CX350 and HC-X2100 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

✓ = category winner

AG-CX350
HC-X2100
Resolution
15 MP✓+81%
8.29 MP
Sensor type
Four Thirds Live MOS
Four Thirds Live MOS
Sensor size
17.3 × 13.0 mm
17.3 × 13.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
AG-CX350
HC-X2100
Processor
Venus Engine
Venus Engine
AG-CX350
HC-X2100
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
51,200✓+1 stop
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
AG-CX350
HC-X2100
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, AG-CX350 or HC-X2100?

AG-CX350 scores 10.0/10 versus 7.5/10 for HC-X2100 — 30fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the AG-CX350 and HC-X2100?

AG-CX350 is 15 MP and HC-X2100 is 8.29 MP, so the AG-CX350 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the AG-CX350 and HC-X2100 have in-body image stabilization?

AG-CX350 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while HC-X2100 has 7-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the AG-CX350 or the HC-X2100?

AG-CX350 reaches 30 fps electronic. HC-X2100 reaches 20 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the AG-CX350 and HC-X2100?

Both bodies weigh roughly 580 g.

Do the AG-CX350 and HC-X2100 record 4K video?

AG-CX350: 8K / 6K (max), 4K up to 120p. HC-X2100: 4K up to 60p.

Are the AG-CX350 and HC-X2100 weather sealed?

AG-CX350: Yes. HC-X2100: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the AG-CX350 and 640 shots for the HC-X2100, giving the HC-X2100 the edge.

How much does each cost?

AG-CX350 launched at $5,995 and HC-X2100 at $3,699. The HC-X2100 is $2,296 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way AG-CX350 vs HC-X2100 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed October 2026.