Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

RED

KOMODO-X

Global-shutter Super 35 cinema camera with 6K REDCODE RAW, RF mount, and a larger body than KOMODO 6K.

$9,995

Launch price

Released Aug 2023

vs

Z CAM

E2-M4

Compact MFT cinema box with 4K 120p, ZRAW, ProRes, and interchangeable MFT lenses.

$1,299

Launch price

Released Jun 2023

KOMODO-X is 2 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

6categories

KOMODO-X

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

Wins

1categories

E2-M4

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

11 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

KOMODO-X wins 4 categories·E2-M4 wins 1 categories
  • BE2-M4 has lower Weight (370 g vs 1130 g)
  • AKOMODO-X has higher RAW buffer depth (120 frames vs 60 frames)
  • AKOMODO-X has higher Resolution (19.9 MP vs 10.28 MP)
  • AKOMODO-X has higher EVF resolution (3,690,000 vs 2,360,000)
  • AKOMODO-X has higher Burst (mechanical) (8 fps vs 6 fps)

Key specs at a glance

KOMODO-XE2-M4
Resolution19.9 MP10.28 MP
Sensor27.03 × 14.26 mmMFT
ISO max25,60025,600
Burst20 fps15 fps
4K120 fps120 fps
IBIS7-stop6-stop
Weight1130 g370 g
Battery640 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

KOMODO-X

114 × 101 × 71 mm

1130 g (2.49 lb / 39.86 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

E2-M4

91 × 66 × 72 mm

370 g (0.82 lb / 13.05 oz)

KOMODO-X is 1mm thinner than E2-M4 but it is also 23mm wider and 35mm taller.

KOMODO-X is 760 g heavier than E2-M4.

Depth (front-to-back): 71mm KOMODO-X · 72mm E2-M4

Sensor size, to scale

KOMODO-X

27.03 × 14.26 mm · APS-C

385 mm² area

E2-M4

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

1.7× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

KOMODO-X: mount data unavailable

E2-M4

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseKOMODO-XE2-M4
Portrait
4.0Fair
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
9.5Excellent
9.5Excellent
Video & Hybrid
9.0Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Landscape
3.5Limited
3.5Limited
Travel
5.5Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
9.0Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Vlogging
5.5Fair
7.5Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

KOMODO-X

  • Codecs

    Adds REDCODE RAW, Apple ProRes 422 HQ

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 114, 101, 71

  • RAW buffer depth

    120 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

  • Resolution

    19.9 MP vs 10.28 MP — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    3,690,000 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    8 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    20 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • IBIS effectiveness

    7 stops vs 6 stops — higher is better

Reasons to choose

E2-M4

  • Codecs

    Adds ZRAW, ProRes

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 91, 66, 72

  • Weight

    370 g vs 1130 g — lower is better

  • AA filter

    Only E2-M4 supports it

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • ISO max (native)Both 25,600
  • AF points / zonesBoth 1053
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

KOMODO-X

Pros

  • Global shutter 6K
  • REDCODE RAW
  • Canon RF mount
  • Compact cinema form

Cons

  • No IBIS
  • Cinema-first ergonomics
  • Premium media costs

E2-M4

Pros

  • Tiny MFT cinema box
  • 4K 120p
  • ZRAW internal
  • Affordable cinema entry

Cons

  • No screen
  • MFT sensor
  • Manual focus workflow

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the KOMODO-X and E2-M4 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

KOMODO-X
E2-M4
Resolution
19.9 MP+94%
10.28 MP
Sensor type
Super 35 Global Shutter CMOS
Four Thirds CMOS
Sensor size
27.03 × 14.26 mm
17.3 × 13.0 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
KOMODO-X
E2-M4
Processor
Image processor
Image processor
KOMODO-X
E2-M4
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
KOMODO-X
E2-M4
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for travel, KOMODO-X or E2-M4?

E2-M4 scores 8.0/10 versus 5.5/10 for KOMODO-X — 370g — ultralight for all-day carry.

What's the resolution difference between the KOMODO-X and E2-M4?

KOMODO-X is 19.9 MP and E2-M4 is 10.28 MP, so the KOMODO-X captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the KOMODO-X and E2-M4 have in-body image stabilization?

KOMODO-X has 7-stop in-body image stabilization, while E2-M4 has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the KOMODO-X or the E2-M4?

KOMODO-X reaches 20 fps electronic. E2-M4 reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the KOMODO-X and E2-M4?

KOMODO-X weighs 1130 g and E2-M4 weighs 370 g, so the E2-M4 is 760 g lighter.

Do the KOMODO-X and E2-M4 record 4K video?

KOMODO-X: 6K 17:9 (max), 4K up to 120p. E2-M4: 4K up to 120p.

Are the KOMODO-X and E2-M4 weather sealed?

KOMODO-X: Yes. E2-M4: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the KOMODO-X and 640 shots for the E2-M4, giving the E2-M4 the edge.

How much does each cost?

KOMODO-X launched at $9,995 and E2-M4 at $1,299. The E2-M4 is $8,696 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way KOMODO-X vs E2-M4 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.