Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
Alpha 7 IV

Sony

Alpha 7 IV

33MP hybrid all-rounder with 10-bit 4K 60p and AI-powered subject tracking.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Oct 2021

vs

Sony

PXW-Z200

AI-powered XDCAM with 1-inch Exmor RS sensor, 20x G Lens zoom, 4K60/120p, 12G-SDI, XAVC MXF, variable ND, and RTMP/SRT streaming.

$3,999

Launch price

Released Sep 2024

PXW-Z200 is 2.9 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

6categories

Alpha 7 IV

PortraitWildlife

Wins

3categories

PXW-Z200

WildlifeSports & Action

7 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

Alpha 7 IV wins 5 categories·PXW-Z200 wins 0 categories
  • AAlpha 7 IV has higher RAW buffer depth (828 frames vs 120 frames)
  • AAlpha 7 IV has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 200 Mbps)
  • AAlpha 7 IV has lower Weight (658 g vs 1960 g)
  • AAlpha 7 IV has higher Resolution (33 MP vs 14 MP)
  • AAlpha 7 IV has higher ISO max (native) (51,200 vs 25,600)

Key specs at a glance

Alpha 7 IVPXW-Z200
Resolution33 MP14 MP
SensorFull Frame13.2 × 8.8 mm
ISO max51,20025,600
Burst10 fps20 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS5.5-stopNo
Weight658 g1960 g
Battery580 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Alpha 7 IV front view

Alpha 7 IV

131 × 96 × 80 mm

658 g (1.45 lb / 23.21 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

PXW-Z200

176 × 201 × 371 mm

1960 g (4.32 lb / 69.14 oz)

Alpha 7 IV is 44mm narrower, 105mm shorter, and 291mm thinner than PXW-Z200.

Alpha 7 IV is 1302 g lighter than PXW-Z200.

Depth (front-to-back): 80mm Alpha 7 IV · 371mm PXW-Z200

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

Alpha 7 IV back view

Alpha 7 IV

131 × 96 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

PXW-Z200

176 × 201 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

Alpha 7 IV top view

Alpha 7 IV

131 × 80 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

PXW-Z200

176 × 371 mm

Sensor size, to scale

Alpha 7 IV

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

PXW-Z200

13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1″

116 mm² area

7.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

Alpha 7 IV

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

PXW-Z200: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseAlpha 7 IVPXW-Z200
Portrait
9.0Excellent✓ wins
3.0Limited
Sports & Action
6.5Good
7.0Good✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Landscape
7.5Good✓ wins
1.0Limited
Travel
7.0Good✓ wins
3.0Limited
Wildlife
8.0Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7 IV

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 131.3, 96.4, 79.8

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A, SD UHS-II

  • RAW buffer depth

    828 frames vs 120 frames — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 200 Mbps — higher is better

  • Weight

    658 g vs 1960 g — lower is better

  • Resolution

    33 MP vs 14 MP — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    51,200 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Insect, Car/Train, Airplane

Reasons to choose

PXW-Z200

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 175.6, 201.3, 371.1

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Burst (electronic)

    20 fps vs 10 fps — higher is better

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only PXW-Z200 supports it

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC MXF, MPEG HD422

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Vehicle

  • IBIS effectiveness

    7 stops vs 5.5 stops — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 580 shots — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 94 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Alpha 7 IV

Pros

  • 33MP — more detail for cropping and print
  • 10-bit 4K 60p (Super35 crop) / 4K 30p full-frame
  • Full-size HDMI port
  • 759 phase-detect AF points

Cons

  • 4K 60p requires Super35 crop
  • 10fps burst lags behind R6 II at 40fps
  • Complex menu system

PXW-Z200

Pros

  • 12G-SDI + timecode in/out for broadcast
  • XAVC MXF / XAVC S-I / XAVC HS codecs
  • AI subject recognition AF + auto framing
  • 4K up to 60p / 120p slow motion
  • Variable ND (1/4–1/128) + S-Cinetone

Cons

  • Premium over HXR-NX800
  • Heavy at 1.96 kg body-only
  • Some MXF features require firmware 2.0+
  • C3 Portal streaming is paid add-on

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Alpha 7 IV and PXW-Z200 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

Alpha 7 IV
PXW-Z200
Resolution
33 MP2.4× more
14 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame Exmor R CMOS
1.0-type stacked Exmor RS CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
13.2 × 8.8 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
Alpha 7 IV
PXW-Z200
Aperture
f/2.8–4.5
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
24–480 mm (35mm equivalent)
Alpha 7 IV
PXW-Z200
Processor
BIONZ XR
BIONZ XR + AI processing unit
Alpha 7 IV
PXW-Z200
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
51,200+1 stop
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
102,400
Alpha 7 IV
PXW-Z200
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/8000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, Alpha 7 IV or PXW-Z200?

Alpha 7 IV scores 7.5/10 versus 1.0/10 for PXW-Z200 — 33MP — ample resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the Alpha 7 IV and PXW-Z200?

Alpha 7 IV is 33 MP and PXW-Z200 is 14 MP, so the Alpha 7 IV captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Alpha 7 IV and PXW-Z200 have in-body image stabilization?

Alpha 7 IV has 5.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while PXW-Z200 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Alpha 7 IV or the PXW-Z200?

Alpha 7 IV reaches 10 fps electronic. PXW-Z200 reaches 20 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Alpha 7 IV and PXW-Z200?

Alpha 7 IV weighs 658 g and PXW-Z200 weighs 1960 g, so the Alpha 7 IV is 1302 g lighter.

Do the Alpha 7 IV and PXW-Z200 record 4K video?

Alpha 7 IV: 4K up to 60p. PXW-Z200: 4K up to 60p.

Are the Alpha 7 IV and PXW-Z200 weather sealed?

Alpha 7 IV: Yes. PXW-Z200: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 580 shots (CIPA) for the Alpha 7 IV and 640 shots for the PXW-Z200, giving the PXW-Z200 the edge.

How much does each cost?

Alpha 7 IV launched at $2,499 and PXW-Z200 at $3,999. The Alpha 7 IV is $1,500 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way Alpha 7 IV vs PXW-Z200 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Sony press materials.