Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Sony

Alpha 7S III

12MP low-light video specialist with 4K 120p, 16-bit RAW HDMI, and excellent autofocus.

$3,499

Released Sep 2020

vs

Sony

FX2

Compact full-frame cinema camera with 4K 120p, S-Cinetone, and active cooling.

$2,499

Released Feb 2025

FX2 is 4.5 years newer.

Wins

8categories

Alpha 7S III

Video & HybridPortrait

Wins

2categories

FX2

PortraitWildlife

8 categories tied

Check current prices

Search these camera bodies at major authorized retailers to check current discounts, bundled lenses, and certified refurbished deals:

TL;DR — Key differences

Alpha 7S III wins 4 categories·FX2 wins 1 categories
  • AAlpha 7S III has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 200 Mbps)
  • BFX2 has higher Resolution (33 MP vs 12.1 MP)
  • AAlpha 7S III has higher EVF resolution (9,437,184 vs 3,690,000)
  • AAlpha 7S III has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 51,200)
  • AAlpha 7S III has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)

Key specs at a glance

Alpha 7S IIIFX2
Resolution12.1 MP33 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max102,40051,200
Burst10 fps10 fps
4K120 fps60 fps
IBIS5.5-stop5.5-stop
Weight699 g720 g
Battery600 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Alpha 7S III

129 × 97 × 81 mm

699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)

FX2

138 × 98 × 88 mm

720 g (1.59 lb / 25.40 oz)

Alpha 7S III is 9mm narrower, 1mm shorter, and 7mm thinner than FX2.

Alpha 7S III is 21 g lighter than FX2.

Depth (front-to-back): 81mm Alpha 7S III · 88mm FX2

Sensor size, to scale

Alpha 7S III

35.6 × 23.8 mm · Full Frame

847 mm² area

FX2

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

Alpha 7S III

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

FX2

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseAlpha 7S IIIFX2
Portrait
6.5Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
4.0Fair
5.0Fair✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
8.0Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Landscape
5.5Fair
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
6.5Good
7.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
5.5Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7S III

  • AF low-light limit

    -6 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 128.9, 96.9, 80.8

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 200 Mbps — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    9,437,184 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 51,200 — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    80 vs 100 — lower is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.9 × vs 0.78 × — higher is better

Reasons to choose

FX2

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138, 98, 88

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Bird, Insect, Car/Train…

  • Resolution

    33 MP vs 12.1 MP — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 600 shots — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • AF points / zonesBoth 759
  • AF frame coverageBoth 94 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (mechanical)Both 10 fps

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Alpha 7S III

Pros

  • Best-in-class low light
  • 4K 120p
  • Full-size HDMI
  • Strong IBIS

Cons

  • 12MP stills limit
  • Older generation now
  • No 8K

FX2

Pros

  • 4K 120p
  • S-Cinetone / S-Log3
  • Compact cinema body
  • Active cooling

Cons

  • No EVF
  • Photo ergonomics limited
  • Premium price

Full specifications

= category winner

Alpha 7S III
FX2
Resolution
12.1 MP
33 MP2.7× more
Sensor type
Full Frame Exmor R CMOS
Full Frame Exmor R CMOS
Sensor size
35.6 × 23.8 mm
35.9 × 23.9 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
Alpha 7S III
FX2
AF system
Fast Hybrid AF (phase-detection / contrast-detection)
Fast Hybrid AF (phase-detection / contrast-detection)
AF points / zones
759
759
AF frame coverage
94 %
94 %
AF low-light limit
-6 EV
-4 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
Human, Animal
Human, Animal, Bird, Insect, Car/Train, Airplane
Alpha 7S III
FX2
Burst (mechanical)
10 fps
10 fps
Burst (electronic)
10 fps
10 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
No
No
RAW buffer depth
120 frames
120 frames
Alpha 7S III
FX2
Max resolution
4K UHD
4K UHD / DCI 4K
4K max frame rate
120 fps2× more
60 fps
Max video bit rate
600 Mbps3× more
200 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
Yes
Log profile
S-Log3 / HLG / S-Cinetone
S-Log3 / S-Cinetone
Codecs
XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I, H.265, H.264
XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I, H.265, H.264
Alpha 7S III
FX2
Weight
699 g−21 g less
720 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
128.9 × 96.9 × 80.8 mm
138 × 98 × 88 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, Alpha 7S III or FX2?

FX2 scores 8.0/10 versus 5.5/10 for Alpha 7S III — Bird AF subject recognition.

What's the resolution difference between the Alpha 7S III and FX2?

Alpha 7S III is 12.1 MP and FX2 is 33 MP, so the FX2 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Alpha 7S III and FX2 have in-body image stabilization?

Alpha 7S III has 5.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while fX2 has 5.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Alpha 7S III or the FX2?

Alpha 7S III reaches 10 fps electronic. FX2 reaches 10 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Alpha 7S III and FX2?

Alpha 7S III weighs 699 g and FX2 weighs 720 g, so the Alpha 7S III is 21 g lighter.

Do the Alpha 7S III and FX2 record 4K video?

Alpha 7S III: 4K up to 120p. FX2: 4K up to 60p.

Are the Alpha 7S III and FX2 weather sealed?

Alpha 7S III: Yes. FX2: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 600 shots (CIPA) for the Alpha 7S III and 640 shots for the FX2, giving the FX2 the edge.

How much does each cost?

Alpha 7S III launched at $3,499 and FX2 at $2,499. The FX2 is $1,000 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.