Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Sony

Alpha 7S III

12MP low-light video specialist with 4K 120p, 16-bit RAW HDMI, and excellent autofocus.

$3,499

Launch price

Released Sep 2020

vs

Sony

FX9

Full-frame 6K XDCAM camcorder with Dual Base ISO, S-Cinetone, Fast Hybrid AF, variable ND, and oversampled DCI 4K up to 60p.

$10,998

Launch price

Released Sep 2019

Alpha 7S III is 1 year newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

8categories

Alpha 7S III

Video & HybridPortrait

Wins

1categories

FX9

Video & Hybrid

3 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

Alpha 7S III wins 5 categories·FX9 wins 0 categories
  • AAlpha 7S III has higher Burst (mechanical) (10 fps vs 0 fps)
  • AAlpha 7S III has higher Burst (electronic) (10 fps vs 0 fps)
  • AAlpha 7S III has higher IBIS effectiveness (5.5 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AAlpha 7S III has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 4,000)
  • AAlpha 7S III has lower ISO min (native) (80 vs 800)

Key specs at a glance

Alpha 7S IIIFX9
Resolution12.1 MP20.5 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max102,4004,000
Burst10 fps
4K120 fps60 fps
IBIS5.5-stopNo
Weight699 g2000 g
Battery600 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Alpha 7S III

129 × 97 × 81 mm

699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

FX9

146 × 143 × 229 mm

2000 g (4.41 lb / 70.55 oz)

Alpha 7S III is 17mm narrower, 46mm shorter, and 148mm thinner than FX9.

Alpha 7S III is 1301 g lighter than FX9.

Depth (front-to-back): 81mm Alpha 7S III · 229mm FX9

Sensor size, to scale

Alpha 7S III

35.6 × 23.8 mm · Full Frame

847 mm² area

FX9

35.7 × 18.8 mm · Full Frame

671 mm² area

1.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

Alpha 7S III

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

FX9

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseAlpha 7S IIIFX9
Portrait
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Sports & Action
5.5Fair✓ wins
5.0Fair
Video & Hybrid
8.0Excellent✓ wins
6.0Good
Landscape
5.5Fair✓ wins
4.5Fair
Travel
6.5Good✓ wins
2.5Limited
Wildlife
5.5Fair✓ wins
3.0Limited
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
3.5Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7S III

  • Burst (mechanical)

    10 fps vs 0 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    10 fps vs 0 fps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    5.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 128.9, 96.9, 80.8

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 4,000 — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    80 vs 800 — lower is better

  • Weight

    699 g vs 2000 g — lower is better

Reasons to choose

FX9

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC-I, XAVC-L, MPEG HD422

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 146, 142.5, 229

  • Card types

    Adds XQD

  • Resolution

    20.5 MP vs 12.1 MP — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • AF frame coverageBoth 94 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • Card slotsBoth 2

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Alpha 7S III

Pros

  • Best-in-class low light
  • 4K 120p
  • Full-size HDMI
  • Strong IBIS

Cons

  • 12MP stills limit
  • Older generation now
  • No 8K

FX9

Pros

  • Full-frame 6K Exmor R oversampling
  • Dual Base ISO 800 / 4000
  • S-Cinetone + S-Log3
  • Built-in variable ND (1/4–1/128)
  • 12G-SDI + dual XQD slots

Cons

  • Large shoulder-cam form factor
  • Body-only is 2 kg
  • XQD media (not CFexpress)
  • 6K not recorded natively (oversampled 4K)

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Alpha 7S III and FX9 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

Alpha 7S III
FX9
Resolution
12.1 MP
20.5 MP+69%
Sensor type
Full Frame Exmor R CMOS
Full Frame Exmor R CMOS (6K oversampling)
Sensor size
35.6 × 23.8 mm
35.7 × 18.8 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
Alpha 7S III
FX9
Processor
BIONZ XR
BIONZ XR
Alpha 7S III
FX9
ISO min (native)
80−720 less
800
ISO max (native)
102,400+4.7 stops
4,000
ISO max (expanded)
409,600
Alpha 7S III
FX9
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Electronic rolling shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/8000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for travel, Alpha 7S III or FX9?

Alpha 7S III scores 6.5/10 versus 2.5/10 for FX9 — 699g — manageable for travel.

What's the resolution difference between the Alpha 7S III and FX9?

Alpha 7S III is 12.1 MP and FX9 is 20.5 MP, so the FX9 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Alpha 7S III and FX9 have in-body image stabilization?

Alpha 7S III has 5.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while FX9 does not have IBIS.

What's the weight difference between the Alpha 7S III and FX9?

Alpha 7S III weighs 699 g and FX9 weighs 2000 g, so the Alpha 7S III is 1301 g lighter.

Do the Alpha 7S III and FX9 record 4K video?

Alpha 7S III: 4K up to 120p. FX9: 6K oversampled → DCI 4K / UHD 4K (max), 4K up to 60p.

Are the Alpha 7S III and FX9 weather sealed?

Alpha 7S III: Yes. FX9: Yes.

How much does each cost?

Alpha 7S III launched at $3,499 and FX9 at $10,998. The Alpha 7S III is $7,499 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way Alpha 7S III vs FX9 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.