Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Z CAM

E2-F6

Full-frame cinema box with 6K recording, dual native ISO, and EF/PL mount options.

$1,999

Launch price

Released Nov 2022

vs

Z CAM

E2-M4

Compact MFT cinema box with 4K 120p, ZRAW, ProRes, and interchangeable MFT lenses.

$1,299

Launch price

Released Jun 2023

E2-M4 is 7 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

6categories

E2-F6

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

Wins

1categories

E2-M4

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

11 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

E2-F6 wins 4 categories·E2-M4 wins 1 categories
  • AE2-F6 has higher Resolution (24.4 MP vs 10.28 MP)
  • BE2-M4 has lower Weight (370 g vs 850 g)
  • AE2-F6 has higher RAW buffer depth (120 frames vs 60 frames)
  • AE2-F6 has higher EVF resolution (3,690,000 vs 2,360,000)
  • AE2-F6 has higher Burst (mechanical) (8 fps vs 6 fps)

Key specs at a glance

E2-F6E2-M4
Resolution24.4 MP10.28 MP
SensorFull FrameMFT
ISO max25,60025,600
Burst20 fps15 fps
4K120 fps120 fps
IBIS7-stop6-stop
Weight850 g370 g
Battery640 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

E2-F6

112 × 99 × 99 mm

850 g (1.87 lb / 29.98 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

E2-M4

91 × 66 × 72 mm

370 g (0.82 lb / 13.05 oz)

E2-F6 is 21mm wider, 33mm taller, and 27mm thicker than E2-M4.

E2-F6 is 480 g heavier than E2-M4.

Depth (front-to-back): 99mm E2-F6 · 72mm E2-M4

Sensor size, to scale

E2-F6

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

E2-M4

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

E2-F6: mount data unavailable

E2-M4

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseE2-F6E2-M4
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
9.5Excellent
9.5Excellent
Video & Hybrid
9.0Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Travel
6.5Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
9.0Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Vlogging
5.5Fair
7.5Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

E2-F6

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 112, 99, 99

  • Resolution

    24.4 MP vs 10.28 MP — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    120 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    3,690,000 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    8 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    20 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • IBIS effectiveness

    7 stops vs 6 stops — higher is better

Reasons to choose

E2-M4

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 91, 66, 72

  • Weight

    370 g vs 850 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • ISO max (native)Both 25,600
  • AF points / zonesBoth 1053
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

E2-F6

Pros

  • Full-frame 6K
  • Dual native ISO
  • ZRAW & ProRes
  • Compact box form

Cons

  • No IBIS
  • Box ergonomics
  • Requires accessories

E2-M4

Pros

  • Tiny MFT cinema box
  • 4K 120p
  • ZRAW internal
  • Affordable cinema entry

Cons

  • No screen
  • MFT sensor
  • Manual focus workflow

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the E2-F6 and E2-M4 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

E2-F6
E2-M4
Resolution
24.4 MP2.4× more
10.28 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Four Thirds CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
17.3 × 13.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
E2-F6
E2-M4
Processor
Image processor
Image processor
E2-F6
E2-M4
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
E2-F6
E2-M4
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, E2-F6 or E2-M4?

E2-F6 scores 7.5/10 versus 4.0/10 for E2-M4 — 24.4MP — solid resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the E2-F6 and E2-M4?

E2-F6 is 24.4 MP and E2-M4 is 10.28 MP, so the E2-F6 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the E2-F6 and E2-M4 have in-body image stabilization?

E2-F6 has 7-stop in-body image stabilization, while E2-M4 has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the E2-F6 or the E2-M4?

E2-F6 reaches 20 fps electronic. E2-M4 reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the E2-F6 and E2-M4?

E2-F6 weighs 850 g and E2-M4 weighs 370 g, so the E2-M4 is 480 g lighter.

Do the E2-F6 and E2-M4 record 4K video?

E2-F6: 6K (max), 4K up to 120p. E2-M4: 4K up to 120p.

Are the E2-F6 and E2-M4 weather sealed?

E2-F6: Yes. E2-M4: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the E2-F6 and 640 shots for the E2-M4, giving the E2-M4 the edge.

How much does each cost?

E2-F6 launched at $1,999 and E2-M4 at $1,299. The E2-M4 is $700 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way E2-F6 vs E2-M4 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.