Canon
RF 50mm F1.2L USM
Canon RF Mount
Flagship RF 50mm f/1.2 L prime with Ring USM, 15-element design, and weather-sealed L-series build.
$2,299
Launch priceReleased Dec 2018
Fujifilm
GF 23mm F4 R LM WR
Fujifilm GFX Mount
GF 23mm F4 R LM WR — 23mm f/4 for Fujifilm GFX, a popular choice in the fujifilm lineup.
$849
Launch priceReleased Jan 2017
RF 50mm F1.2L USM is 1.9 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
RF 50mm F1.2L USM
Wins
GF 23mm F4 R LM WR
1 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- ARF 50mm F1.2L USM has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/1.2 vs f/4)
- ARF 50mm F1.2L USM has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/1.2 vs f/4)
- ARF 50mm F1.2L USM has higher Max magnification (0.19 × vs 0.13 ×)
- BGF 23mm F4 R LM WR has lower Weight (845 g vs 950 g)
- BGF 23mm F4 R LM WR has lower Min focus distance (38 cm vs 40 cm)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to share
RF 50mm F1.2L USM
⌀90 × 108 mm
950 g (2.09 lb / 33.51 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
GF 23mm F4 R LM WR
⌀89 × 103 mm
845 g (1.86 lb / 29.81 oz)
RF 50mm F1.2L USM is 5mm longer and 1mm wider than GF 23mm F4 R LM WR.
RF 50mm F1.2L USM is 105 g heavier than GF 23mm F4 R LM WR.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the RF 50mm F1.2L USM
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 UD, 1 Aspherical
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/1.2 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/1.2 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Control ring
Only RF 50mm F1.2L USM supports it
- ✓
Max magnification
0.19 × vs 0.13 × — higher is better
Reasons to choose the GF 23mm F4 R LM WR
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 Aspherical, 2 ED, 1 Super ED
- ✓
Weight
845 g vs 950 g — lower is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
38 cm vs 40 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Length
103 mm vs 108 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
89 mm vs 89.8 mm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
RF 50mm F1.2L USM
Pros
- ✓Stunning sharpness even wide open at f/1.2
- ✓Beautiful, smooth bokeh with 10 rounded aperture blades
- ✓Fast and accurate Dual Pixel AF with Ring USM
- ✓Weather-sealed L-series construction
Cons
- –Heavy for a 50mm prime (950g)
- –Premium price for a single focal length
- –No optical image stabilization
GF 23mm F4 R LM WR
Pros
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Fujifilm GFX mount compatibility
Cons
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the RF 50mm F1.2L USM and GF 23mm F4 R LM WR at major authorized retailers.
Canon RF 50mm F1.2L USM
Fujifilm GF 23mm F4 R LM WR
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.