Fujifilm
GF 250mm F4 R LM OIS WR
Fujifilm GFX Mount
GF 250mm F4 R LM OIS WR — 250mm f/4 for Fujifilm GFX, a popular choice in the fujifilm lineup.
$3,299
Launch priceReleased Jan 2018
Fujifilm
XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR
Fujifilm X Mount
The pro-grade standard zoom for X-mount camera bodies, delivering prime-like performance.
$1,199
Launch priceReleased Jan 2015
GF 250mm F4 R LM OIS WR is 3.1 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
GF 250mm F4 R LM OIS WR
Wins
XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AGF 250mm F4 R LM OIS WR has higher OIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
- BXF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR has lower Min focus distance (30 cm vs 140 cm)
- BXF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR has lower Weight (655 g vs 1425 g)
- BXF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR has lower Length (106 mm vs 203.5 mm)
- BXF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareGF 250mm F4 R LM OIS WR
⌀108 × 204 mm
1425 g (3.14 lb / 50.27 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR
⌀83 × 106 mm
655 g (1.44 lb / 23.10 oz)
GF 250mm F4 R LM OIS WR is 98mm longer and 25mm wider than XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR.
GF 250mm F4 R LM OIS WR is 770 g heavier than XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the GF 250mm F4 R LM OIS WR
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 ED, 1 Super ED
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only GF 250mm F4 R LM OIS WR supports it
- ✓
Control ring
Only GF 250mm F4 R LM OIS WR supports it
- ✓
Custom function button
Only GF 250mm F4 R LM OIS WR supports it
- ✓
Max magnification
0.22 × vs 0.16 × — higher is better
Reasons to choose the XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 3 Aspherical, 3 ED
- ✓
Min focus distance
30 cm vs 140 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Weight
655 g vs 1425 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
106 mm vs 203.5 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
83 mm vs 108 mm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
GF 250mm F4 R LM OIS WR
Pros
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR
Pros
- ✓Incredible center-to-corner sharpness across the range
- ✓Professional weather-resistant build quality
- ✓Twin Linear Motors deliver rapid, near-silent autofocus
- ✓Dedicated physical aperture ring
Cons
- –No optical image stabilization
- –Relatively heavy and bulky for an APS-C lens (655g)
- –Filter size of 77mm is large for X-series accessories
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the GF 250mm F4 R LM OIS WR and XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR at major authorized retailers.
Fujifilm GF 250mm F4 R LM OIS WR
Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.