Fujifilm
GF 32-64mm F4 R LM
Fujifilm GFX Mount
GF 32-64mm F4 R LM — 32–64mm f/4 for Fujifilm GFX, a popular choice in the fujifilm lineup.
$1,999
Launch priceReleased Jan 2017
Fujifilm
XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR
Fujifilm X Mount
The pro-grade standard zoom for X-mount camera bodies, delivering prime-like performance.
$1,199
Launch priceReleased Jan 2015
GF 32-64mm F4 R LM is 2 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
GF 32-64mm F4 R LM
Wins
XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR
1 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- BXF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR has lower Length (106 mm vs 173 mm)
- AGF 32-64mm F4 R LM has higher Max magnification (0.25 × vs 0.16 ×)
- BXF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
- BXF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
- BXF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR has lower Weight (655 g vs 875 g)
Key specs at a glance
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the GF 32-64mm F4 R LM
- ✓
Special elements
Adds Aspherical
- ✓
Control ring
Only GF 32-64mm F4 R LM supports it
- ✓
Custom function button
Only GF 32-64mm F4 R LM supports it
- ✓
Diameter
70 mm vs 83 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.25 × vs 0.16 × — higher is better
Reasons to choose the XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 3 Aspherical, 3 ED
- ✓
Length
106 mm vs 173 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Weight
655 g vs 875 g — lower is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
30 cm vs 38 cm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
GF 32-64mm F4 R LM
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Fujifilm GFX mount compatibility
Cons
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR
Pros
- ✓Incredible center-to-corner sharpness across the range
- ✓Professional weather-resistant build quality
- ✓Twin Linear Motors deliver rapid, near-silent autofocus
- ✓Dedicated physical aperture ring
Cons
- –No optical image stabilization
- –Relatively heavy and bulky for an APS-C lens (655g)
- –Filter size of 77mm is large for X-series accessories
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the GF 32-64mm F4 R LM and XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR at major authorized retailers.
Fujifilm GF 32-64mm F4 R LM
Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.