Fujifilm
GF 80mm F1.7 R WR
Fujifilm GFX Mount
World's fastest medium-format autofocus lens — F1.7 portrait prime with 795g body and weather sealing.
$2,299
Launch priceReleased Jan 2021

Sony
FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
Sony E Mount
The ultimate standard zoom — incredibly sharp, exceptionally compact, and built for professionals.
$2,299
Launch priceReleased Apr 2022
FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II is 1.3 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
GF 80mm F1.7 R WR
Wins
FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
1 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- BFE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II has lower Min focus distance (21 cm vs 70 cm)
- BFE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II has higher Max magnification (0.32 × vs 0.15 ×)
- AGF 80mm F1.7 R WR has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/1.7 vs f/2.8)
- AGF 80mm F1.7 R WR has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/1.7 vs f/2.8)
- AGF 80mm F1.7 R WR has lower Length (99.2 mm vs 120 mm)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareGF 80mm F1.7 R WR
⌀95 × 99 mm
795 g (1.75 lb / 28.04 oz)

Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale

FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
⌀88 × 120 mm
695 g (1.53 lb / 24.52 oz)
GF 80mm F1.7 R WR is 21mm shorter and 7mm wider than FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II.
GF 80mm F1.7 R WR is 100 g heavier than FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the GF 80mm F1.7 R WR
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 Aspherical
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/1.7 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/1.7 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Length
99.2 mm vs 120 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 XA (extreme aspherical), 3 Aspherical, 2 ED
- ✓
Min focus distance
21 cm vs 70 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.32 × vs 0.15 × — higher is better
- ✓
Weight
695 g vs 795 g — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
88 mm vs 94.7 mm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Custom function button
Both support custom function button
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
GF 80mm F1.7 R WR
Pros
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Fujifilm GFX mount compatibility
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
Pros
- ✓Outstanding sharpness across the entire zoom range
- ✓Remarkably small and lightweight for an f/2.8 zoom
- ✓Four XD Linear focus motors provide blazing-fast AF tracking
- ✓Excellent close-up magnification
- ✓De-clickable aperture ring and customized function buttons
Cons
- –No built-in optical image stabilization (relies on body IBIS)
- –High launch price
- –Aperture ring can be easily bumped if not locked
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the GF 80mm F1.7 R WR and FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II at major authorized retailers.
Fujifilm GF 80mm F1.7 R WR
Sony FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.