Fujifilm
XF 150-600mm F5.6-8 R LM OIS WR
Fujifilm X Mount
XF 150-600mm F5.6-8 R LM OIS WR — 150–600mm f/5.6-8 for Fujifilm X, a popular choice in the fujifilm lineup.
$1,999
Launch priceReleased May 2022
Sony
FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
Sony E Mount
The ultimate standard zoom — incredibly sharp, exceptionally compact, and built for professionals.
$2,299
Launch priceReleased Apr 2022
Released within a month of each other.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
XF 150-600mm F5.6-8 R LM OIS WR
Wins
FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AXF 150-600mm F5.6-8 R LM OIS WR has higher OIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
- BFE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II has lower Min focus distance (21 cm vs 240 cm)
- BFE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/2.8 vs f/8)
- BFE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II has lower Length (120 mm vs 314.5 mm)
- BFE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II has lower Weight (695 g vs 1605 g)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareXF 150-600mm F5.6-8 R LM OIS WR
⌀99 × 315 mm
1605 g (3.54 lb / 56.61 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
⌀88 × 120 mm
695 g (1.53 lb / 24.52 oz)
XF 150-600mm F5.6-8 R LM OIS WR is 195mm longer and 11mm wider than FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II.
XF 150-600mm F5.6-8 R LM OIS WR is 910 g heavier than FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the XF 150-600mm F5.6-8 R LM OIS WR
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 3 ED, 4 Super ED
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only XF 150-600mm F5.6-8 R LM OIS WR supports it
Reasons to choose the FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 XA (extreme aspherical), 3 Aspherical, 2 ED…
- ✓
Min focus distance
21 cm vs 240 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.8 vs f/8 — lower is better
- ✓
Length
120 mm vs 314.5 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Weight
695 g vs 1605 g — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.8 vs f/5.6 — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
88 mm vs 99 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.32 × vs 0.24 × — higher is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Custom function button
Both support custom function button
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
XF 150-600mm F5.6-8 R LM OIS WR
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
Pros
- ✓Outstanding sharpness across the entire zoom range
- ✓Remarkably small and lightweight for an f/2.8 zoom
- ✓Four XD Linear focus motors provide blazing-fast AF tracking
- ✓Excellent close-up magnification
- ✓De-clickable aperture ring and customized function buttons
Cons
- –No built-in optical image stabilization (relies on body IBIS)
- –High launch price
- –Aperture ring can be easily bumped if not locked
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the XF 150-600mm F5.6-8 R LM OIS WR and FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II at major authorized retailers.
Fujifilm XF 150-600mm F5.6-8 R LM OIS WR
Sony FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.