Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Fujifilm

XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR

Fujifilm X Mount

The pro-grade standard zoom for X-mount camera bodies, delivering prime-like performance.

$1,199

Launch price

Released Jan 2015

vs

Fujifilm

XF 35mm F1.4 R

Fujifilm X Mount

XF 35mm F1.4 R — 35mm f/1.4 for Fujifilm X, a popular choice in the fujifilm lineup.

$599

Launch price

Released Jan 2012

XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR is 3 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

1categories

XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR

LandscapeSports & Action

Wins

5categories

XF 35mm F1.4 R

PortraitSports & Action

2 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR wins 0 categories·XF 35mm F1.4 R wins 5 categories
  • BXF 35mm F1.4 R has lower Weight (187 g vs 655 g)
  • BXF 35mm F1.4 R has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/1.4 vs f/2.8)
  • BXF 35mm F1.4 R has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/1.4 vs f/2.8)
  • BXF 35mm F1.4 R has lower Length (76 mm vs 106 mm)
  • BXF 35mm F1.4 R has lower Diameter (70 mm vs 83 mm)

Key specs at a glance

XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WRXF 35mm F1.4 R
Focal Length16-55 mm35 mm
Max Aperturef/2.8f/1.4
MountFujifilm XFujifilm X
CoverageAPS-CAPS-C
StabilizationNoNo
Weight655 g187 g
Min Focus30 cm30 cm
Filter Size77 mm67 mm

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseXF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WRXF 35mm F1.4 R
Portrait
4.5Fair
6.5Good
Sports & Action
6.5Good
6.5Good
Video & Hybrid
4.0Fair
3.5Limited
Landscape
8.0Excellent
2.0Limited
Travel
5.5Fair
5.0Fair
Wildlife
3.0Limited
1.0Limited
Macro & Close-up
1.5Limited
1.5Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose the XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR

  • Special elements

    Adds 3 Aspherical, 3 ED

  • Weather sealing

    Only XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR supports it

  • Max magnification

    0.16 × vs 0.15 × — higher is better

Reasons to choose the XF 35mm F1.4 R

  • Special elements

    Adds Aspherical, ED

  • Weight

    187 g vs 655 g — lower is better

  • Max aperture (Wide)

    f/1.4 vs f/2.8 — lower is better

  • Max aperture (Tele)

    f/1.4 vs f/2.8 — lower is better

  • Length

    76 mm vs 106 mm — lower is better

  • Diameter

    70 mm vs 83 mm — lower is better

Shared specifications

Min focus distance

Both 30 cm

Internal focus

Both support internal focus

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR

Pros

  • Incredible center-to-corner sharpness across the range
  • Professional weather-resistant build quality
  • Twin Linear Motors deliver rapid, near-silent autofocus
  • Dedicated physical aperture ring

Cons

  • No optical image stabilization
  • Relatively heavy and bulky for an APS-C lens (655g)
  • Filter size of 77mm is large for X-series accessories

XF 35mm F1.4 R

Pros

  • Bright f/1.4 aperture for low light and subject separation
  • Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
  • Lightweight design easy to carry all day

Cons

  • Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR and XF 35mm F1.4 R at major authorized retailers.

Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR
XF 35mm F1.4 R
Focal length (Min)
16 mm
35 mm
Focal length (Max)
55 mm
35 mm
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.8
f/1.4+2 stops wider
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.8
f/1.4+2 stops wider
Elements
17
10
Groups
12
8
Special elements
3 Aspherical, 3 ED
Aspherical, ED
XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR
XF 35mm F1.4 R
Min focus distance
30 cm
30 cm
Max magnification
0.16 ×+7%
0.15 ×
Autofocus motor
Twin Linear Motors
Linear / Stepping Motor
Internal focus
Yes
Yes
XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR
XF 35mm F1.4 R
Optical stabilization
No
No
OIS effectiveness
0 stops
0 stops
XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR
XF 35mm F1.4 R
Weight
655 g
187 g−468 g less
Length
106 mm
76 mm−30 mm less
Diameter
83 mm
70 mm−13 mm less
Filter thread size
77 mm
67 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
No
Diaphragm blades
9
11
XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR
XF 35mm F1.4 R
Lens mount
Fujifilm X
Fujifilm X
Format coverage
APS-C
APS-C

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.