Fujifilm
XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR
Fujifilm X Mount
The pro-grade standard zoom for X-mount camera bodies, delivering prime-like performance.
$1,199
Launch priceReleased Jan 2015
Fujifilm
XF 60mm F2.4 R Macro
Fujifilm X Mount
XF 60mm F2.4 R Macro — 60mm f/2.4 for Fujifilm X, a popular choice in the fujifilm lineup.
$649
Launch priceReleased Jan 2012
XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR is 3 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR
Wins
XF 60mm F2.4 R Macro
1 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- BXF 60mm F2.4 R Macro has higher Max magnification (1 × vs 0.16 ×)
- BXF 60mm F2.4 R Macro has lower Weight (215 g vs 655 g)
- BXF 60mm F2.4 R Macro has lower Length (80 mm vs 106 mm)
- BXF 60mm F2.4 R Macro has lower Diameter (70 mm vs 83 mm)
- BXF 60mm F2.4 R Macro has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2.4 vs f/2.8)
Key specs at a glance
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 3 Aspherical, 3 ED
- ✓
Weather sealing
Only XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR supports it
Reasons to choose the XF 60mm F2.4 R Macro
- ✓
Special elements
Adds Aspherical
- ✓
Max magnification
1 × vs 0.16 × — higher is better
- ✓
Weight
215 g vs 655 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
80 mm vs 106 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
70 mm vs 83 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.4 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.4 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
28 cm vs 30 cm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR
Pros
- ✓Incredible center-to-corner sharpness across the range
- ✓Professional weather-resistant build quality
- ✓Twin Linear Motors deliver rapid, near-silent autofocus
- ✓Dedicated physical aperture ring
Cons
- –No optical image stabilization
- –Relatively heavy and bulky for an APS-C lens (655g)
- –Filter size of 77mm is large for X-series accessories
XF 60mm F2.4 R Macro
Pros
- ✓Lightweight design easy to carry all day
- ✓Solid optical performance for the price tier
- ✓Native Fujifilm X mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR and XF 60mm F2.4 R Macro at major authorized retailers.
Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR
Fujifilm XF 60mm F2.4 R Macro
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.