Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Fujifilm

XF 16mm F1.4 R WR

Fujifilm X Mount

XF 16mm F1.4 R WR — 16mm f/1.4 for Fujifilm X, a popular choice in the fujifilm lineup.

$999

Launch price

Released Apr 2015

vs

Sony

FE 50mm F1.4 GM

Sony E Mount

FE 50mm F1.4 GM — 50mm f/1.4 for Sony E, a popular choice in the sony lineup.

$1,799

Launch price

Released Mar 2025

FE 50mm F1.4 GM is 9.9 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

3categories

XF 16mm F1.4 R WR

LandscapePortrait

Wins

0categories

FE 50mm F1.4 GM

PortraitSports & Action

5 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

XF 16mm F1.4 R WR wins 3 categories·FE 50mm F1.4 GM wins 0 categories
  • AXF 16mm F1.4 R WR has lower Weight (375 g vs 580 g)
  • AXF 16mm F1.4 R WR has lower Length (103 mm vs 131 mm)
  • AXF 16mm F1.4 R WR has lower Diameter (65 mm vs 81 mm)

Key specs at a glance

XF 16mm F1.4 R WRFE 50mm F1.4 GM
Focal Length16 mm50 mm
Max Aperturef/1.4f/1.4
MountFujifilm XSony E
CoverageAPS-CFull Frame
StabilizationNoNo
Weight375 g580 g
Min Focus30 cm30 cm
Filter Size62 mm77 mm

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseXF 16mm F1.4 R WRFE 50mm F1.4 GM
Portrait
6.5Good
8.5Excellent
Sports & Action
6.5Good
6.5Good
Video & Hybrid
4.5Fair
4.5Fair
Landscape
9.0Excellent
4.0Fair
Travel
5.0Fair
3.5Limited
Wildlife
3.0Limited
3.0Limited
Macro & Close-up
1.5Limited
1.5Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose the XF 16mm F1.4 R WR

  • Weight

    375 g vs 580 g — lower is better

  • Length

    103 mm vs 131 mm — lower is better

  • Diameter

    65 mm vs 81 mm — lower is better

Reasons to choose the FE 50mm F1.4 GM

  • Custom function button

    Only FE 50mm F1.4 GM supports it

Shared specifications

Max aperture (Wide)

Both f/1.4

Max aperture (Tele)

Both f/1.4

Min focus distance

Both 30 cm

Max magnification

Both 0.15 ×

Internal focus

Both support internal focus

Weather sealing

Both support weather sealing

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

XF 16mm F1.4 R WR

Pros

  • Bright f/1.4 aperture for low light and subject separation
  • Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
  • Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
  • Lightweight design easy to carry all day

Cons

  • Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value

FE 50mm F1.4 GM

Pros

  • Bright f/1.4 aperture for low light and subject separation
  • Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
  • Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting

Cons

  • Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the XF 16mm F1.4 R WR and FE 50mm F1.4 GM at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

XF 16mm F1.4 R WR
FE 50mm F1.4 GM
Focal length (Min)
16 mm
50 mm
Focal length (Max)
16 mm
50 mm
Max aperture (Wide)
f/1.4
f/1.4
Max aperture (Tele)
f/1.4
f/1.4
Elements
10
14
Groups
8
11
Special elements
Aspherical, ED
Aspherical, ED
XF 16mm F1.4 R WR
FE 50mm F1.4 GM
Min focus distance
30 cm
30 cm
Max magnification
0.15 ×
0.15 ×
Autofocus motor
Linear / Stepping Motor
Linear / Stepping Motor
Internal focus
Yes
Yes
XF 16mm F1.4 R WR
FE 50mm F1.4 GM
Optical stabilization
No
No
OIS effectiveness
0 stops
0 stops
XF 16mm F1.4 R WR
FE 50mm F1.4 GM
Weight
375 g−205 g less
580 g
Length
103 mm−28 mm less
131 mm
Diameter
65 mm−16 mm less
81 mm
Filter thread size
62 mm
77 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes
Diaphragm blades
11
11
XF 16mm F1.4 R WR
FE 50mm F1.4 GM
Lens mount
Fujifilm X
Sony E
Format coverage
APS-C
Full Frame

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.