Fujifilm
XF 200mm F2 R LM OIS WR
Fujifilm X Mount
305mm-equiv. F2 super-telephoto prime with 5-stop OIS, linear AF, and weather sealing.
$5,999
Launch priceReleased Sep 2018
Fujifilm
XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Fujifilm X Mount
762mm-equiv. super-telephoto at only 1335g with 5.5-stop OIS and linear AF.
$3,699
Launch priceReleased Oct 2024
XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR is 6.1 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
XF 200mm F2 R LM OIS WR
Wins
XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AXF 200mm F2 R LM OIS WR has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2 vs f/5.6)
- AXF 200mm F2 R LM OIS WR has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/2 vs f/5.6)
- BXF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR has lower Weight (1335 g vs 2265 g)
- BXF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR has higher Max magnification (0.2 × vs 0.12 ×)
- AXF 200mm F2 R LM OIS WR has lower Min focus distance (180 cm vs 275 cm)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareXF 200mm F2 R LM OIS WR
⌀122 × 206 mm
2265 g (4.99 lb / 79.90 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
⌀105 × 256 mm
1335 g (2.94 lb / 47.09 oz)
XF 200mm F2 R LM OIS WR is 50mm shorter and 18mm wider than XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR.
XF 200mm F2 R LM OIS WR is 930 g heavier than XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the XF 200mm F2 R LM OIS WR
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 ED, 1 Super ED
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2 vs f/5.6 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2 vs f/5.6 — lower is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
180 cm vs 275 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Length
205.5 mm vs 255.5 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 5 ED, 2 Super ED
- ✓
Weight
1335 g vs 2265 g — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
104.5 mm vs 122 mm — lower is better
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5.5 stops vs 5 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.2 × vs 0.12 × — higher is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Optical stabilization
Both support optical stabilization
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Custom function button
Both support custom function button
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
XF 200mm F2 R LM OIS WR
Pros
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Pros
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the XF 200mm F2 R LM OIS WR and XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR at major authorized retailers.
Fujifilm XF 200mm F2 R LM OIS WR
Fujifilm XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.