Fujifilm
XF 35mm F2 R WR
Fujifilm X Mount
XF 35mm F2 R WR — 35mm f/2 for Fujifilm X, a popular choice in the fujifilm lineup.
$399
Launch priceReleased Oct 2015
Tamron
28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
Sony E Mount
An incredibly popular third-party zoom updated with vastly improved sharpness and autofocus.
$899
Launch priceReleased Aug 2021
28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 is 5.8 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
XF 35mm F2 R WR
Wins
28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
1 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AXF 35mm F2 R WR has lower Weight (170 g vs 540 g)
- B28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 has higher Max magnification (0.37 × vs 0.15 ×)
- B28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 has lower Min focus distance (18 cm vs 30 cm)
- AXF 35mm F2 R WR has lower Length (74 mm vs 118 mm)
- AXF 35mm F2 R WR has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2 vs f/2.8)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareXF 35mm F2 R WR
⌀70 × 74 mm
170 g (0.37 lb / 6.00 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
⌀76 × 118 mm
540 g (1.19 lb / 19.05 oz)
XF 35mm F2 R WR is 44mm shorter and 6mm narrower than 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2.
XF 35mm F2 R WR is 370 g lighter than 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the XF 35mm F2 R WR
- ✓
Special elements
Adds Aspherical
- ✓
Weight
170 g vs 540 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
74 mm vs 118 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
70 mm vs 76 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 LD, 2 GM
- ✓
Weather sealing
Only 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 supports it
- ✓
Custom function button
Only 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 supports it
- ✓
Min focus distance
18 cm vs 30 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.37 × vs 0.15 × — higher is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
XF 35mm F2 R WR
Pros
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Lightweight design easy to carry all day
- ✓Native Fujifilm X mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
Pros
- ✓Superb value for money compared to first-party options
- ✓Excellent sharpness throughout the range, even at f/2.8
- ✓Very lightweight and compact (only 540g)
- ✓Fast VXD linear motor focus drive
- ✓Customizable lens functions via Tamron Lens Utility software
Cons
- –Starts at 28mm instead of the wider 24mm standard
- –Slightly weaker corner sharpness at 75mm wide open
- –Weather sealing is basic compared to Sony GM lenses
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the XF 35mm F2 R WR and 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2 at major authorized retailers.
Fujifilm XF 35mm F2 R WR
Tamron 28-75mm F2.8 Di III VXD G2
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.