Fujifilm
XF 56mm F1.2 R WR II
Fujifilm X Mount
XF 56mm F1.2 R WR II — 56mm f/1.2 for Fujifilm X, a popular choice in the fujifilm lineup.
$999
Launch priceReleased Sep 2022
Fujifilm
XF 70-300mm F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR
Fujifilm X Mount
XF 70-300mm F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR — 70–300mm f/4-5.6 for Fujifilm X, a popular choice in the fujifilm lineup.
$799
Launch priceReleased Mar 2021
XF 56mm F1.2 R WR II is 1.6 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
XF 56mm F1.2 R WR II
Wins
XF 70-300mm F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR
TL;DR — Key differences
- BXF 70-300mm F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR has higher OIS effectiveness (5.5 stops vs 0 stops)
- AXF 56mm F1.2 R WR II has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/1.2 vs f/5.6)
- AXF 56mm F1.2 R WR II has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/1.2 vs f/4)
- AXF 56mm F1.2 R WR II has lower Min focus distance (30 cm vs 83 cm)
- BXF 70-300mm F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR has higher Max magnification (0.33 × vs 0.15 ×)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
XF 56mm F1.2 R WR II
⌀70 × 112 mm
445 g (0.98 lb / 15.70 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
XF 70-300mm F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR
⌀75 × 133 mm
580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)
XF 56mm F1.2 R WR II is 21mm shorter and 5mm narrower than XF 70-300mm F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR.
XF 56mm F1.2 R WR II is 135 g lighter than XF 70-300mm F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the XF 56mm F1.2 R WR II
- ✓
Special elements
Adds Aspherical, ED
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/1.2 vs f/5.6 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/1.2 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
30 cm vs 83 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Control ring
Only XF 56mm F1.2 R WR II supports it
- ✓
Weight
445 g vs 580 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
112 mm vs 132.5 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
70 mm vs 75 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the XF 70-300mm F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 Aspherical, 2 ED
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only XF 70-300mm F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR supports it
- ✓
Max magnification
0.33 × vs 0.15 × — higher is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
XF 56mm F1.2 R WR II
Pros
- ✓Bright f/1.2 aperture for low light and subject separation
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
XF 70-300mm F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Native Fujifilm X mount compatibility
Cons
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the XF 56mm F1.2 R WR II and XF 70-300mm F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR at major authorized retailers.
Fujifilm XF 56mm F1.2 R WR II
Fujifilm XF 70-300mm F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.