Leica
APO-Summicron-SL 75mm f/2 ASPH.
Leica L Mount
APO-Summicron-SL 75mm f/2 ASPH. — 75mm f/2 for Leica L, a popular choice in the leica lineup.
$4,195
Launch priceReleased Apr 2022
Sony
FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
Sony E Mount
The ultimate standard zoom — incredibly sharp, exceptionally compact, and built for professionals.
$2,299
Launch priceReleased Apr 2022
Released within a month of each other.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
APO-Summicron-SL 75mm f/2 ASPH.
Wins
FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
1 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- BFE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II has lower Min focus distance (21 cm vs 50 cm)
- BFE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II has higher Max magnification (0.32 × vs 0.17 ×)
- AAPO-Summicron-SL 75mm f/2 ASPH. has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2 vs f/2.8)
- AAPO-Summicron-SL 75mm f/2 ASPH. has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/2 vs f/2.8)
- AAPO-Summicron-SL 75mm f/2 ASPH. has lower Diameter (73 mm vs 88 mm)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
APO-Summicron-SL 75mm f/2 ASPH.
⌀73 × 104 mm
640 g (1.41 lb / 22.58 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
⌀88 × 120 mm
695 g (1.53 lb / 24.52 oz)
APO-Summicron-SL 75mm f/2 ASPH. is 16mm shorter and 15mm narrower than FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II.
APO-Summicron-SL 75mm f/2 ASPH. is 55 g lighter than FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the APO-Summicron-SL 75mm f/2 ASPH.
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
73 mm vs 88 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Length
104 mm vs 120 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Weight
640 g vs 695 g — lower is better
Reasons to choose the FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 XA (extreme aspherical), 2 ED, 2 Super ED
- ✓
Min focus distance
21 cm vs 50 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.32 × vs 0.17 × — higher is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Custom function button
Both support custom function button
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
APO-Summicron-SL 75mm f/2 ASPH.
Pros
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Leica L mount compatibility
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
Pros
- ✓Outstanding sharpness across the entire zoom range
- ✓Remarkably small and lightweight for an f/2.8 zoom
- ✓Four XD Linear focus motors provide blazing-fast AF tracking
- ✓Excellent close-up magnification
- ✓De-clickable aperture ring and customized function buttons
Cons
- –No built-in optical image stabilization (relies on body IBIS)
- –High launch price
- –Aperture ring can be easily bumped if not locked
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the APO-Summicron-SL 75mm f/2 ASPH. and FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II at major authorized retailers.
Leica APO-Summicron-SL 75mm f/2 ASPH.
Sony FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.