Leica
Summilux-SL 35mm f/1.4 ASPH.
Leica L Mount
Summilux-SL 35mm f/1.4 ASPH. — 35mm f/1.4 for Leica L, a popular choice in the leica lineup.
$4,595
Launch priceReleased Apr 2021

Sony
FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
Sony E Mount
The ultimate standard zoom — incredibly sharp, exceptionally compact, and built for professionals.
$2,299
Launch priceReleased Apr 2022
FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II is 1 year newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
Summilux-SL 35mm f/1.4 ASPH.
Wins
FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
2 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- ASummilux-SL 35mm f/1.4 ASPH. has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/1.4 vs f/2.8)
- ASummilux-SL 35mm f/1.4 ASPH. has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/1.4 vs f/2.8)
- BFE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II has higher Max magnification (0.32 × vs 0.17 ×)
- BFE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II has lower Min focus distance (21 cm vs 30 cm)
- ASummilux-SL 35mm f/1.4 ASPH. has lower Length (102 mm vs 120 mm)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareSummilux-SL 35mm f/1.4 ASPH.
⌀76 × 102 mm
695 g (1.53 lb / 24.52 oz)

Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale

FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
⌀88 × 120 mm
695 g (1.53 lb / 24.52 oz)
Summilux-SL 35mm f/1.4 ASPH. is 18mm shorter and 12mm narrower than FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II.
Summilux-SL 35mm f/1.4 ASPH. and FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II weigh the same.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the Summilux-SL 35mm f/1.4 ASPH.
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/1.4 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/1.4 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 4 Aspherical
- ✓
Length
102 mm vs 120 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
76 mm vs 88 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 XA (extreme aspherical), 3 Aspherical, 2 Super ED
- ✓
Min focus distance
21 cm vs 30 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.32 × vs 0.17 × — higher is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weight
Both 695 g
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Custom function button
Both support custom function button
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
Summilux-SL 35mm f/1.4 ASPH.
Pros
- ✓Bright f/1.4 aperture for low light and subject separation
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
Pros
- ✓Outstanding sharpness across the entire zoom range
- ✓Remarkably small and lightweight for an f/2.8 zoom
- ✓Four XD Linear focus motors provide blazing-fast AF tracking
- ✓Excellent close-up magnification
- ✓De-clickable aperture ring and customized function buttons
Cons
- –No built-in optical image stabilization (relies on body IBIS)
- –High launch price
- –Aperture ring can be easily bumped if not locked
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the Summilux-SL 35mm f/1.4 ASPH. and FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II at major authorized retailers.
Leica Summilux-SL 35mm f/1.4 ASPH.
Sony FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.