
Nikon
NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.4
Nikon Z Mount
NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.4 — 35mm f/1.4 for Nikon Z, a popular choice in the nikon lineup.
$677
Launch priceReleased Jan 2025

Sony
FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
Sony E Mount
The ultimate standard zoom — incredibly sharp, exceptionally compact, and built for professionals.
$2,299
Launch priceReleased Apr 2022
NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.4 is 2.7 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.4
Wins
FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
1 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- ANIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.4 has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/1.4 vs f/2.8)
- ANIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.4 has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/1.4 vs f/2.8)
- BFE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II has higher Max magnification (0.32 × vs 0.18 ×)
- ANIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.4 has lower Weight (415 g vs 695 g)
- ANIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.4 has lower Length (88.5 mm vs 120 mm)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to share
NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.4
⌀75 × 89 mm
415 g (0.91 lb / 14.64 oz)

Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale

FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
⌀88 × 120 mm
695 g (1.53 lb / 24.52 oz)
NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.4 is 32mm shorter and 14mm narrower than FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II.
NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.4 is 280 g lighter than FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.4
- ✓
Special elements
Adds Aspherical, ED
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/1.4 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/1.4 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Weight
415 g vs 695 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
88.5 mm vs 120 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
74.5 mm vs 88 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 XA (extreme aspherical), 3 Aspherical, 2 ED…
- ✓
Min focus distance
21 cm vs 27 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.32 × vs 0.18 × — higher is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Custom function button
Both support custom function button
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.4
Pros
- ✓Bright f/1.4 aperture for low light and subject separation
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
Pros
- ✓Outstanding sharpness across the entire zoom range
- ✓Remarkably small and lightweight for an f/2.8 zoom
- ✓Four XD Linear focus motors provide blazing-fast AF tracking
- ✓Excellent close-up magnification
- ✓De-clickable aperture ring and customized function buttons
Cons
- –No built-in optical image stabilization (relies on body IBIS)
- –High launch price
- –Aperture ring can be easily bumped if not locked
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.4 and FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II at major authorized retailers.
Nikon NIKKOR Z 35mm f/1.4
Sony FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.