Nikon
NIKKOR Z 400mm f/2.8 TC VR S
Nikon Z Mount
Built-in 1.4× teleconverter (560mm F4) super-telephoto with S-line optics and VR.
$13,999
Launch priceReleased Apr 2022
Sony
FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS
Sony E Mount
World's lightest 300mm F2.8 — 1470g with XD Linear AF, OSS, and G Master resolution.
$6,999
Launch priceReleased Jan 2024
FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS is 1.8 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
NIKKOR Z 400mm f/2.8 TC VR S
Wins
FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS
2 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- BFE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS has lower Weight (1470 g vs 2950 g)
- ANIKKOR Z 400mm f/2.8 TC VR S has higher Max magnification (0.2 × vs 0.16 ×)
- BFE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS has lower Min focus distance (200 cm vs 250 cm)
- ANIKKOR Z 400mm f/2.8 TC VR S has lower Diameter (104 mm vs 124 mm)
- ANIKKOR Z 400mm f/2.8 TC VR S has higher OIS effectiveness (5.5 stops vs 5 stops)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareNIKKOR Z 400mm f/2.8 TC VR S
⌀104 × 276 mm
2950 g (6.50 lb / 104.06 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS
⌀124 × 265 mm
1470 g (3.24 lb / 51.85 oz)
NIKKOR Z 400mm f/2.8 TC VR S is 11mm longer and 20mm narrower than FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS.
NIKKOR Z 400mm f/2.8 TC VR S is 1480 g heavier than FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the NIKKOR Z 400mm f/2.8 TC VR S
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 ED, 1 Fluorite, 1 SR
- ✓
Diameter
104 mm vs 124 mm — lower is better
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5.5 stops vs 5 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.2 × vs 0.16 × — higher is better
Reasons to choose the FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 3 Super ED, 1 ED
- ✓
Weight
1470 g vs 2950 g — lower is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
200 cm vs 250 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Length
265 mm vs 276 mm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Max aperture (Wide)
Both f/2.8
Max aperture (Tele)
Both f/2.8
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Optical stabilization
Both support optical stabilization
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
NIKKOR Z 400mm f/2.8 TC VR S
Pros
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS
Pros
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the NIKKOR Z 400mm f/2.8 TC VR S and FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS at major authorized retailers.
Nikon NIKKOR Z 400mm f/2.8 TC VR S
Sony FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.