Nikon
NIKKOR Z 600mm f/4 TC VR S
Nikon Z Mount
NIKKOR Z 600mm f/4 TC VR S — 600mm f/4 for Nikon Z, a popular choice in the nikon lineup.
$15,499
Launch priceReleased Jun 2022
Sony
FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS
Sony E Mount
World's lightest 300mm F2.8 — 1470g with XD Linear AF, OSS, and G Master resolution.
$6,999
Launch priceReleased Jan 2024
FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS is 1.6 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
NIKKOR Z 600mm f/4 TC VR S
Wins
FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS
1 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- ANIKKOR Z 600mm f/4 TC VR S has lower Min focus distance (30 cm vs 200 cm)
- BFE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS has lower Weight (1470 g vs 3260 g)
- ANIKKOR Z 600mm f/4 TC VR S has lower Diameter (81 mm vs 124 mm)
- BFE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
- BFE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
NIKKOR Z 600mm f/4 TC VR S
⌀81 × 280 mm
3260 g (7.19 lb / 114.99 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS
⌀124 × 265 mm
1470 g (3.24 lb / 51.85 oz)
NIKKOR Z 600mm f/4 TC VR S is 15mm longer and 43mm narrower than FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS.
NIKKOR Z 600mm f/4 TC VR S is 1790 g heavier than FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the NIKKOR Z 600mm f/4 TC VR S
- ✓
Special elements
Adds Aspherical
- ✓
Min focus distance
30 cm vs 200 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
81 mm vs 124 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 3 Super ED, 1 ED
- ✓
Weight
1470 g vs 3260 g — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Length
265 mm vs 280 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.16 × vs 0.15 × — higher is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Optical stabilization
Both support optical stabilization
OIS effectiveness
Both 5 stops
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Custom function button
Both support custom function button
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
NIKKOR Z 600mm f/4 TC VR S
Pros
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS
Pros
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the NIKKOR Z 600mm f/4 TC VR S and FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS at major authorized retailers.
Nikon NIKKOR Z 600mm f/4 TC VR S
Sony FE 300mm F2.8 GM OSS
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.