Nikon
NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
Nikon Z Mount
NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S — 70–200mm f/2.8 for Nikon Z, a popular choice in the nikon lineup.
$2,599
Launch priceReleased Oct 2020
Nikon
NIKKOR Z DX 12-28mm f/3.5-5.6 PZ VR
Nikon Z Mount
NIKKOR Z DX 12-28mm f/3.5-5.6 PZ VR — 12–28mm f/3.5-5.6 for Nikon Z, a popular choice in the nikon lineup.
$359
Launch priceReleased Dec 2022
NIKKOR Z DX 12-28mm f/3.5-5.6 PZ VR is 2.2 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
Wins
NIKKOR Z DX 12-28mm f/3.5-5.6 PZ VR
3 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- BNIKKOR Z DX 12-28mm f/3.5-5.6 PZ VR has lower Weight (205 g vs 1360 g)
- BNIKKOR Z DX 12-28mm f/3.5-5.6 PZ VR has lower Length (79 mm vs 240 mm)
- ANIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/2.8 vs f/5.6)
- ANIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2.8 vs f/3.5)
- BNIKKOR Z DX 12-28mm f/3.5-5.6 PZ VR has lower Diameter (65 mm vs 81 mm)
Key specs at a glance
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.8 vs f/5.6 — lower is better
- ✓
Weather sealing
Only NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S supports it
- ✓
Control ring
Only NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S supports it
- ✓
Custom function button
Only NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S supports it
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.8 vs f/3.5 — lower is better
Reasons to choose the NIKKOR Z DX 12-28mm f/3.5-5.6 PZ VR
- ✓
Weight
205 g vs 1360 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
79 mm vs 240 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
65 mm vs 81 mm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Min focus distance
Both 38 cm
Max magnification
Both 0.25 ×
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Optical stabilization
Both support optical stabilization
OIS effectiveness
Both 5 stops
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
NIKKOR Z DX 12-28mm f/3.5-5.6 PZ VR
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Lightweight design easy to carry all day
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S and NIKKOR Z DX 12-28mm f/3.5-5.6 PZ VR at major authorized retailers.
Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S
Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 12-28mm f/3.5-5.6 PZ VR
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.