OM System
M.Zuiko Digital ED 150-600mm F5.0-6.3 IS
Micro Four Thirds Mount
300–1200mm-equiv. super-tele zoom with 0.7× magnification at 56 cm, Sync IS, and 2060 g body.
$1,999
Launch priceReleased Jun 2024
OM System
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
Micro Four Thirds Mount
50mm-equiv. F1.2 standard prime with 19-element design, 30 cm close focus, and IPX1 weather sealing.
$1,199
Launch priceReleased Nov 2017
M.Zuiko Digital ED 150-600mm F5.0-6.3 IS is 6.6 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
M.Zuiko Digital ED 150-600mm F5.0-6.3 IS
Wins
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 150-600mm F5.0-6.3 IS has higher OIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 150-600mm F5.0-6.3 IS has higher Max magnification (0.7 × vs 0.11 ×)
- BM.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/1.2 vs f/6.3)
- BM.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO has lower Weight (410 g vs 2060 g)
- BM.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/1.2 vs f/5)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to share
M.Zuiko Digital ED 150-600mm F5.0-6.3 IS
⌀109 × 264 mm
2060 g (4.54 lb / 72.66 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
⌀70 × 87 mm
410 g (0.90 lb / 14.46 oz)
M.Zuiko Digital ED 150-600mm F5.0-6.3 IS is 177mm longer and 39mm wider than M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO.
M.Zuiko Digital ED 150-600mm F5.0-6.3 IS is 1650 g heavier than M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the M.Zuiko Digital ED 150-600mm F5.0-6.3 IS
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 4 Super ED, 2 ED
- ✓
Max magnification
0.7 × vs 0.11 × — higher is better
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only M.Zuiko Digital ED 150-600mm F5.0-6.3 IS supports it
- ✓
Custom function button
Only M.Zuiko Digital ED 150-600mm F5.0-6.3 IS supports it
Reasons to choose the M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/1.2 vs f/6.3 — lower is better
- ✓
Weight
410 g vs 2060 g — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/1.2 vs f/5 — lower is better
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 DSA, 3 ED, 1 Super ED
- ✓
Length
87 mm vs 264.4 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
30 cm vs 56 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
70 mm vs 109.4 mm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
M.Zuiko Digital ED 150-600mm F5.0-6.3 IS
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
Pros
- ✓Bright f/1.2 aperture for low light and subject separation
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the M.Zuiko Digital ED 150-600mm F5.0-6.3 IS and M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO at major authorized retailers.
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 150-600mm F5.0-6.3 IS
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.