OM System
M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO II
Micro Four Thirds Mount
414g ultra-wide PRO II with improved edge sharpness and the same f/2.8 constant aperture.
$1,499
Launch priceReleased Oct 2024
OM System
M.Zuiko Digital ED 8-25mm F4 PRO
Micro Four Thirds Mount
Ultra-wide 8–25mm F4 PRO zoom (16–50mm equiv.) with IP53 sealing, 0.21× magnification, and retracting design.
$1,099
Launch priceReleased Jun 2020
M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO II is 4.3 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO II
Wins
M.Zuiko Digital ED 8-25mm F4 PRO
1 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- BM.Zuiko Digital ED 8-25mm F4 PRO has higher Max magnification (0.21 × vs 0.12 ×)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO II has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO II has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
- BM.Zuiko Digital ED 8-25mm F4 PRO has lower Length (88.5 mm vs 106 mm)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO II has lower Min focus distance (20 cm vs 23 cm)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO II
⌀78 × 106 mm
414 g (0.91 lb / 14.60 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
M.Zuiko Digital ED 8-25mm F4 PRO
⌀77 × 89 mm
411 g (0.91 lb / 14.50 oz)
M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO II is 18mm longer and 1mm wider than M.Zuiko Digital ED 8-25mm F4 PRO.
M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO II is 3 g heavier than M.Zuiko Digital ED 8-25mm F4 PRO.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO II
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 Aspherical, 2 ED, 1 HR
- ✓
Custom function button
Only M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO II supports it
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
20 cm vs 23 cm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the M.Zuiko Digital ED 8-25mm F4 PRO
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 DSA, 2 Aspherical ED, 1 ED…
- ✓
Length
88.5 mm vs 106 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.21 × vs 0.12 × — higher is better
- ✓
Diameter
77 mm vs 78 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Weight
411 g vs 414 g — lower is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO II
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Micro Four Thirds mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
M.Zuiko Digital ED 8-25mm F4 PRO
Pros
- ✓Constant F4 across 8–25mm
- ✓IP53 weather sealing with ZERO coating
- ✓Retracting barrel — only 411g
Cons
- –No front filter thread (optional CP adapter)
- –Extending zoom barrel
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO II and M.Zuiko Digital ED 8-25mm F4 PRO at major authorized retailers.
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm F2.8 PRO II
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 8-25mm F4 PRO
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.