Panasonic
LUMIX S 35mm F1.8
Leica L Mount
LUMIX S 35mm F1.8 — 35mm f/1.8 for Leica L, a popular choice in the panasonic lineup.
$599
Launch priceReleased Nov 2022
Sony
FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
Sony E Mount
The ultimate standard zoom — incredibly sharp, exceptionally compact, and built for professionals.
$2,299
Launch priceReleased Apr 2022
LUMIX S 35mm F1.8 is 7 months newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
LUMIX S 35mm F1.8
Wins
FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
1 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- ALUMIX S 35mm F1.8 has lower Weight (295 g vs 695 g)
- ALUMIX S 35mm F1.8 has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/1.8 vs f/2.8)
- ALUMIX S 35mm F1.8 has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/1.8 vs f/2.8)
- ALUMIX S 35mm F1.8 has lower Length (82 mm vs 120 mm)
- BFE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II has higher Max magnification (0.32 × vs 0.22 ×)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to share
LUMIX S 35mm F1.8
⌀74 × 82 mm
295 g (0.65 lb / 10.41 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
⌀88 × 120 mm
695 g (1.53 lb / 24.52 oz)
LUMIX S 35mm F1.8 is 38mm shorter and 14mm narrower than FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II.
LUMIX S 35mm F1.8 is 400 g lighter than FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the LUMIX S 35mm F1.8
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 Aspherical, 1 ED
- ✓
Weight
295 g vs 695 g — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/1.8 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/1.8 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Length
82 mm vs 120 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
73.6 mm vs 88 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 XA (extreme aspherical), 3 Aspherical, 2 ED…
- ✓
Control ring
Only FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II supports it
- ✓
Custom function button
Only FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II supports it
- ✓
Min focus distance
21 cm vs 24 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.32 × vs 0.22 × — higher is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
LUMIX S 35mm F1.8
Pros
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Lightweight design easy to carry all day
- ✓Native Leica L mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
Pros
- ✓Outstanding sharpness across the entire zoom range
- ✓Remarkably small and lightweight for an f/2.8 zoom
- ✓Four XD Linear focus motors provide blazing-fast AF tracking
- ✓Excellent close-up magnification
- ✓De-clickable aperture ring and customized function buttons
Cons
- –No built-in optical image stabilization (relies on body IBIS)
- –High launch price
- –Aperture ring can be easily bumped if not locked
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the LUMIX S 35mm F1.8 and FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II at major authorized retailers.
Panasonic LUMIX S 35mm F1.8
Sony FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.