Sigma
56mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary
Fujifilm X Mount
56mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary — 56mm f/1.4 for Fujifilm X, a popular choice in the sigma lineup.
$429
Launch priceReleased Jun 2023
Sigma
70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS Sports
Sony E Mount
70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS Sports — 70–200mm f/2.8 for Sony E, a popular choice in the sigma lineup.
$1,499
Launch priceReleased Jul 2023
Released within a month of each other.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
56mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary
Wins
70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS Sports
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- B70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS Sports has higher OIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
- A56mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary has lower Weight (280 g vs 1345 g)
- A56mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary has lower Length (66.5 mm vs 238 mm)
- A56mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/1.4 vs f/2.8)
- A56mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/1.4 vs f/2.8)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to share56mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary
⌀67 × 67 mm
280 g (0.62 lb / 9.88 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS Sports
⌀81 × 238 mm
1345 g (2.97 lb / 47.44 oz)
56mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary is 172mm shorter and 14mm narrower than 70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS Sports.
56mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary is 1065 g lighter than 70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS Sports.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the 56mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 SLD, 2 Aspherical
- ✓
Weight
280 g vs 1345 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
66.5 mm vs 238 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/1.4 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/1.4 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
67.4 mm vs 81 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the 70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS Sports
- ✓
Special elements
Adds Aspherical
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only 70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS Sports supports it
- ✓
Weather sealing
Only 70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS Sports supports it
- ✓
Control ring
Only 70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS Sports supports it
- ✓
Custom function button
Only 70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS Sports supports it
- ✓
Min focus distance
38 cm vs 50 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.25 × vs 0.14 × — higher is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
56mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary
Pros
- ✓Bright f/1.4 aperture for low light and subject separation
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Lightweight design easy to carry all day
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS Sports
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the 56mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary and 70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS Sports at major authorized retailers.
Sigma 56mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary
Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS Sports
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.