Sigma
70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS Sports
Sony E Mount
70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS Sports — 70–200mm f/2.8 for Sony E, a popular choice in the sigma lineup.
$1,499
Launch priceReleased Jul 2023
Sigma
85mm F1.4 DG DN Art
Leica L Mount
85mm F1.4 DG DN Art — 85mm f/1.4 for Leica L, a popular choice in the sigma lineup.
$1,199
Launch priceReleased Aug 2021
70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS Sports is 2 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS Sports
Wins
85mm F1.4 DG DN Art
TL;DR — Key differences
- A70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS Sports has higher OIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
- B85mm F1.4 DG DN Art has lower Length (96.1 mm vs 238 mm)
- A70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS Sports has lower Min focus distance (38 cm vs 85 cm)
- B85mm F1.4 DG DN Art has lower Weight (642 g vs 1345 g)
- A70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS Sports has higher Max magnification (0.25 × vs 0.12 ×)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS Sports
⌀81 × 238 mm
1345 g (2.97 lb / 47.44 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
85mm F1.4 DG DN Art
⌀79 × 96 mm
642 g (1.42 lb / 22.65 oz)
70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS Sports is 142mm longer and 2mm wider than 85mm F1.4 DG DN Art.
70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS Sports is 703 g heavier than 85mm F1.4 DG DN Art.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the 70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS Sports
- ✓
Special elements
Adds Aspherical
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
38 cm vs 85 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only 70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS Sports supports it
- ✓
Custom function button
Only 70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS Sports supports it
- ✓
Max magnification
0.25 × vs 0.12 × — higher is better
Reasons to choose the 85mm F1.4 DG DN Art
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 SLD, 3 Aspherical
- ✓
Length
96.1 mm vs 238 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Weight
642 g vs 1345 g — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/1.4 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/1.4 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
78.9 mm vs 81 mm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS Sports
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
85mm F1.4 DG DN Art
Pros
- ✓Bright f/1.4 aperture for low light and subject separation
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the 70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS Sports and 85mm F1.4 DG DN Art at major authorized retailers.
Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 DG DN OS Sports
Sigma 85mm F1.4 DG DN Art
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.