Sony
E PZ 10-20mm F4 G OSS
Sony E Mount
E PZ 10-20mm F4 G OSS — 10–20mm f/4 for Sony E, a popular choice in the sony lineup.
$899
Launch priceReleased May 2022
Sony
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II
Sony E Mount
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II — 16–35mm f/2.8 for Sony E, a popular choice in the sony lineup.
$2,299
Launch priceReleased Aug 2023
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II is 1.3 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
E PZ 10-20mm F4 G OSS
Wins
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AE PZ 10-20mm F4 G OSS has higher OIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
- AE PZ 10-20mm F4 G OSS has lower Weight (178 g vs 547 g)
- BFE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II has lower Min focus distance (22.1 cm vs 38 cm)
- AE PZ 10-20mm F4 G OSS has lower Length (75 mm vs 111.5 mm)
- BFE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareE PZ 10-20mm F4 G OSS
⌀65 × 75 mm
178 g (0.39 lb / 6.28 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II
⌀88 × 112 mm
547 g (1.21 lb / 19.29 oz)
E PZ 10-20mm F4 G OSS is 37mm shorter and 23mm narrower than FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II.
E PZ 10-20mm F4 G OSS is 369 g lighter than FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the E PZ 10-20mm F4 G OSS
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Weight
178 g vs 547 g — lower is better
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only E PZ 10-20mm F4 G OSS supports it
- ✓
Length
75 mm vs 111.5 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
65 mm vs 87.8 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II
- ✓
Control ring
Only FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II supports it
- ✓
Custom function button
Only FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II supports it
- ✓
Min focus distance
22.1 cm vs 38 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.32 × vs 0.25 × — higher is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
E PZ 10-20mm F4 G OSS
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Lightweight design easy to carry all day
Cons
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Sony E mount compatibility
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the E PZ 10-20mm F4 G OSS and FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II at major authorized retailers.
Sony E PZ 10-20mm F4 G OSS
Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.