Sony
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II
Sony E Mount
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II — 16–35mm f/2.8 for Sony E, a popular choice in the sony lineup.
$2,299
Launch priceReleased Aug 2023
Sony
FE PZ 16-35mm F4 G OSS
Sony E Mount
FE PZ 16-35mm F4 G OSS — 16–35mm f/4 for Sony E, a popular choice in the sony lineup.
$1,399
Launch priceReleased May 2022
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II is 1.3 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II
Wins
FE PZ 16-35mm F4 G OSS
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- BFE PZ 16-35mm F4 G OSS has higher OIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
- AFE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II has lower Min focus distance (22.1 cm vs 38 cm)
- BFE PZ 16-35mm F4 G OSS has lower Weight (353 g vs 547 g)
- AFE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
- AFE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to share
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II
⌀88 × 112 mm
547 g (1.21 lb / 19.29 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
FE PZ 16-35mm F4 G OSS
⌀86 × 99 mm
353 g (0.78 lb / 12.45 oz)
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II is 13mm longer and 2mm wider than FE PZ 16-35mm F4 G OSS.
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II is 194 g heavier than FE PZ 16-35mm F4 G OSS.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II
- ✓
Min focus distance
22.1 cm vs 38 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.32 × vs 0.25 × — higher is better
Reasons to choose the FE PZ 16-35mm F4 G OSS
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only FE PZ 16-35mm F4 G OSS supports it
- ✓
Weight
353 g vs 547 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
99 mm vs 111.5 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
86 mm vs 87.8 mm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Custom function button
Both support custom function button
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Sony E mount compatibility
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
FE PZ 16-35mm F4 G OSS
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Lightweight design easy to carry all day
Cons
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II and FE PZ 16-35mm F4 G OSS at major authorized retailers.
Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II
Sony FE PZ 16-35mm F4 G OSS
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.