Sony
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II
Sony E Mount
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II — 16–35mm f/2.8 for Sony E, a popular choice in the sony lineup.
$2,299
Launch priceReleased Aug 2023
Sony
FE 70-200mm F4 Macro G OSS II
Sony E Mount
FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS II — 70–200mm f/4 for Sony E, a popular choice in the sony lineup.
$1,799
Launch priceReleased Jul 2023
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II is 2 months newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II
Wins
FE 70-200mm F4 Macro G OSS II
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- BFE 70-200mm F4 Macro G OSS II has higher OIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
- BFE 70-200mm F4 Macro G OSS II has higher Max magnification (0.5 × vs 0.32 ×)
- AFE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II has lower Weight (547 g vs 794 g)
- AFE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
- AFE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to share
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II
⌀88 × 112 mm
547 g (1.21 lb / 19.29 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
FE 70-200mm F4 Macro G OSS II
⌀82 × 149 mm
794 g (1.75 lb / 28.01 oz)
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II is 38mm shorter and 6mm wider than FE 70-200mm F4 Macro G OSS II.
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II is 247 g lighter than FE 70-200mm F4 Macro G OSS II.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II
- ✓
Weight
547 g vs 794 g — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Length
111.5 mm vs 149 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
22.1 cm vs 26 cm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the FE 70-200mm F4 Macro G OSS II
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only FE 70-200mm F4 Macro G OSS II supports it
- ✓
Max magnification
0.5 × vs 0.32 × — higher is better
- ✓
Diameter
82.2 mm vs 87.8 mm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Custom function button
Both support custom function button
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Sony E mount compatibility
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
FE 70-200mm F4 Macro G OSS II
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II and FE 70-200mm F4 Macro G OSS II at major authorized retailers.
Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM II
Sony FE 70-200mm F4 Macro G OSS II
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.