Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Sony

FE 35mm F1.4 GM

Sony E Mount

FE 35mm F1.4 GM — 35mm f/1.4 for Sony E, a popular choice in the sony lineup.

$1,399

Launch price

Released Mar 2021

vs

Sony

FE 35mm F1.8

Sony E Mount

FE 35mm F1.8 — 35mm f/1.8 for Sony E, a popular choice in the sony lineup.

$749

Launch price

Released Sep 2019

FE 35mm F1.4 GM is 1.5 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

2categories

FE 35mm F1.4 GM

PortraitSports & Action

Wins

2categories

FE 35mm F1.8

Sports & ActionPortrait

4 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

FE 35mm F1.4 GM wins 2 categories·FE 35mm F1.8 wins 2 categories
  • BFE 35mm F1.8 has lower Weight (279 g vs 524 g)
  • BFE 35mm F1.8 has lower Length (89 mm vs 123 mm)
  • AFE 35mm F1.4 GM has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/1.4 vs f/1.8)
  • AFE 35mm F1.4 GM has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/1.4 vs f/1.8)

Key specs at a glance

FE 35mm F1.4 GMFE 35mm F1.8
Focal Length35 mm35 mm
Max Aperturef/1.4f/1.8
MountSony ESony E
CoverageFull FrameFull Frame
StabilizationNoNo
Weight524 g279 g
Min Focus30 cm30 cm
Filter Size67 mm67 mm

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseFE 35mm F1.4 GMFE 35mm F1.8
Portrait
6.5Good
6.0Good
Sports & Action
6.5Good
6.5Good
Video & Hybrid
4.5Fair
3.5Limited
Landscape
4.0Fair
4.0Fair
Travel
3.5Limited
6.0Good
Wildlife
3.0Limited
3.0Limited
Macro & Close-up
1.5Limited
1.5Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose the FE 35mm F1.4 GM

  • Special elements

    Adds ED

  • Control ring

    Only FE 35mm F1.4 GM supports it

  • Custom function button

    Only FE 35mm F1.4 GM supports it

  • Max aperture (Wide)

    f/1.4 vs f/1.8 — lower is better

  • Max aperture (Tele)

    f/1.4 vs f/1.8 — lower is better

Reasons to choose the FE 35mm F1.8

  • Weight

    279 g vs 524 g — lower is better

  • Length

    89 mm vs 123 mm — lower is better

Shared specifications

Min focus distance

Both 30 cm

Max magnification

Both 0.15 ×

Internal focus

Both support internal focus

Diameter

Both 70 mm

Weather sealing

Both support weather sealing

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

FE 35mm F1.4 GM

Pros

  • Bright f/1.4 aperture for low light and subject separation
  • Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
  • Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting

Cons

  • Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value

FE 35mm F1.8

Pros

  • Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
  • Lightweight design easy to carry all day
  • Native Sony E mount compatibility

Cons

  • Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the FE 35mm F1.4 GM and FE 35mm F1.8 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

FE 35mm F1.4 GM
FE 35mm F1.8
Focal length (Min)
35 mm
35 mm
Focal length (Max)
35 mm
35 mm
Max aperture (Wide)
f/1.4+0.7 stops wider
f/1.8
Max aperture (Tele)
f/1.4+0.7 stops wider
f/1.8
Elements
10
10
Groups
8
8
Special elements
Aspherical, ED
Aspherical
FE 35mm F1.4 GM
FE 35mm F1.8
Min focus distance
30 cm
30 cm
Max magnification
0.15 ×
0.15 ×
Autofocus motor
Linear / Stepping Motor
Linear / Stepping Motor
Internal focus
Yes
Yes
FE 35mm F1.4 GM
FE 35mm F1.8
Optical stabilization
No
No
OIS effectiveness
0 stops
0 stops
FE 35mm F1.4 GM
FE 35mm F1.8
Weight
524 g
279 g−245 g less
Length
123 mm
89 mm−34 mm less
Diameter
70 mm
70 mm
Filter thread size
67 mm
67 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes
Diaphragm blades
11
11
FE 35mm F1.4 GM
FE 35mm F1.8
Lens mount
Sony E
Sony E
Format coverage
Full Frame
Full Frame

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.