Tamron
17-28mm F2.8 Di III RXD
Leica L Mount
17-28mm F2.8 Di III RXD — 17–28mm f/2.8 for Leica L, a popular choice in the tamron lineup.
$799
Launch priceReleased Jun 2020
Tamron
35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD
Sony E Mount
35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD — 35–150mm f/2-2.8 for Sony E, a popular choice in the tamron lineup.
$1,899
Launch priceReleased Sep 2022
35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD is 2.3 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
17-28mm F2.8 Di III RXD
Wins
35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD
2 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- A17-28mm F2.8 Di III RXD has lower Weight (438 g vs 1165 g)
- A17-28mm F2.8 Di III RXD has lower Length (92 mm vs 213 mm)
- A17-28mm F2.8 Di III RXD has lower Min focus distance (19 cm vs 38 cm)
- B35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2 vs f/2.8)
- B35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD has higher Max magnification (0.25 × vs 0.19 ×)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
17-28mm F2.8 Di III RXD
⌀80 × 92 mm
438 g (0.97 lb / 15.45 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD
⌀70 × 213 mm
1165 g (2.57 lb / 41.09 oz)
17-28mm F2.8 Di III RXD is 121mm shorter and 10mm wider than 35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD.
17-28mm F2.8 Di III RXD is 727 g lighter than 35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the 17-28mm F2.8 Di III RXD
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 LD, 2 GM Aspherical
- ✓
Weight
438 g vs 1165 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
92 mm vs 213 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
19 cm vs 38 cm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the 35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD
- ✓
Special elements
Adds Aspherical
- ✓
Control ring
Only 35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD supports it
- ✓
Custom function button
Only 35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD supports it
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2 vs f/2.8 — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
70 mm vs 79.6 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.25 × vs 0.19 × — higher is better
Shared specifications
Max aperture (Tele)
Both f/2.8
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
17-28mm F2.8 Di III RXD
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Solid optical performance for the price tier
- ✓Native Leica L mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Sony E mount compatibility
Cons
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –No optical stabilization — relies on body IBIS
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the 17-28mm F2.8 Di III RXD and 35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD at major authorized retailers.
Tamron 17-28mm F2.8 Di III RXD
Tamron 35-150mm F2-2.8 Di III VXD
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.