Viltrox
AF 13mm F1.4 XF
Fujifilm X Mount
AF 13mm F1.4 XF — 13mm f/1.4 for Fujifilm X, a popular choice in the viltrox lineup.
$429
Launch priceReleased Aug 2023
Viltrox
AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z
Nikon Z Mount
AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z — 35mm f/1.2 for Nikon Z, a popular choice in the viltrox lineup.
$1,099
Launch priceReleased Sep 2024
AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z is 1.1 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
AF 13mm F1.4 XF
Wins
AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z
2 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- AAF 13mm F1.4 XF has lower Weight (370 g vs 920 g)
- AAF 13mm F1.4 XF has lower Min focus distance (20 cm vs 35 cm)
- AAF 13mm F1.4 XF has lower Length (74 mm vs 109 mm)
- BAF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/1.2 vs f/1.4)
- BAF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/1.2 vs f/1.4)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
AF 13mm F1.4 XF
⌀74 × 74 mm
370 g (0.82 lb / 13.05 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z
⌀82 × 109 mm
920 g (2.03 lb / 32.45 oz)
AF 13mm F1.4 XF is 35mm shorter and 8mm narrower than AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z.
AF 13mm F1.4 XF is 550 g lighter than AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the AF 13mm F1.4 XF
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 ED, 2 HR
- ✓
Weight
370 g vs 920 g — lower is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
20 cm vs 35 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Length
74 mm vs 109 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
74 mm vs 82 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 3 ED, 3 HR
- ✓
Control ring
Only AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z supports it
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/1.2 vs f/1.4 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/1.2 vs f/1.4 — lower is better
Shared specifications
Max magnification
Both 0.1 ×
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
AF 13mm F1.4 XF
Pros
- ✓Bright f/1.4 aperture for low light and subject separation
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Lightweight design easy to carry all day
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z
Pros
- ✓Bright f/1.2 aperture for low light and subject separation
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the AF 13mm F1.4 XF and AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z at major authorized retailers.
Viltrox AF 13mm F1.4 XF
Viltrox AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.