Viltrox
AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z
Nikon Z Mount
AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z — 35mm f/1.2 for Nikon Z, a popular choice in the viltrox lineup.
$1,099
Launch priceReleased Sep 2024
Viltrox
AF 56mm F1.2 Pro XF
Fujifilm X Mount
AF 56mm F1.2 Pro XF — 56mm f/1.2 for Fujifilm X, a popular choice in the viltrox lineup.
$729
Launch priceReleased May 2023
AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z is 1.3 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z
Wins
AF 56mm F1.2 Pro XF
4 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- BAF 56mm F1.2 Pro XF has lower Weight (595 g vs 920 g)
- AAF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z has lower Min focus distance (35 cm vs 50 cm)
- BAF 56mm F1.2 Pro XF has lower Length (99 mm vs 109 mm)
- BAF 56mm F1.2 Pro XF has lower Diameter (76 mm vs 82 mm)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareAF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z
⌀82 × 109 mm
920 g (2.03 lb / 32.45 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
AF 56mm F1.2 Pro XF
⌀76 × 99 mm
595 g (1.31 lb / 20.99 oz)
AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z is 10mm longer and 6mm wider than AF 56mm F1.2 Pro XF.
AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z is 325 g heavier than AF 56mm F1.2 Pro XF.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 Aspherical, 3 ED, 3 HR
- ✓
Control ring
Only AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z supports it
- ✓
Min focus distance
35 cm vs 50 cm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the AF 56mm F1.2 Pro XF
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 Aspherical, 2 ED, 2 HR
- ✓
Weight
595 g vs 920 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
99 mm vs 109 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
76 mm vs 82 mm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Max aperture (Wide)
Both f/1.2
Max aperture (Tele)
Both f/1.2
Max magnification
Both 0.1 ×
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z
Pros
- ✓Bright f/1.2 aperture for low light and subject separation
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
AF 56mm F1.2 Pro XF
Pros
- ✓Bright f/1.2 aperture for low light and subject separation
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Native Fujifilm X mount compatibility
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z and AF 56mm F1.2 Pro XF at major authorized retailers.
Viltrox AF 35mm F1.2 LAB Z
Viltrox AF 56mm F1.2 Pro XF
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.