Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R1

Canon

EOS R1

Flagship 24.2MP full-frame BSI stacked RF body with 40fps burst, Dual Pixel Intelligent AF, 6K RAW, and 9.44M-dot EVF.

$6,299

Launch price

Released Jul 2024

vs
Osmo 360 II

DJI

Osmo 360 II

Second-gen 8K 360 director’s camera with dual 1/1.1-inch square sensors, native 8K60, 14.5-stop DR, SuperNight 2.0, user-replaceable lenses, 120MP RAW stills, NFC, and 105GB built-in storage.

$599

Launch price

Released Aug 2026

Osmo 360 II is 2.1 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

6categories

EOS R1

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

Wins

2categories

Osmo 360 II

Sports & ActionTravel

3 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R1 wins 3 categories·Osmo 360 II wins 2 categories
  • AEOS R1 has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 0)
  • BOsmo 360 II has lower Weight (183 g vs 920 g)
  • BOsmo 360 II has higher Resolution (120 MP vs 24.2 MP)
  • AEOS R1 has higher Battery life (CIPA) (1330 shots vs 520 shots)
  • AEOS R1 has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 51,200)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R1Osmo 360 II
Resolution24.2 MP120 MP
SensorFull Frame1/1.1 inch
ISO max102,40051,200
Burst40 fps30 fps
4K120 fps120 fps
IBIS8.5-stopNo
Weight920 g183 g
Battery1330 shots520 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R1 front view

EOS R1

158 × 150 × 87 mm

920 g (2.03 lb / 32.45 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Osmo 360 II front view

Osmo 360 II

36 × 81 × 61 mm

183 g (0.40 lb / 6.46 oz)

EOS R1 is 121mm wider, 69mm taller, and 26mm thicker than Osmo 360 II.

EOS R1 is 737 g heavier than Osmo 360 II.

Depth (front-to-back): 87mm EOS R1 · 61mm Osmo 360 II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R1 back view

EOS R1

158 × 150 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Osmo 360 II

36 × 81 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R1 top view

EOS R1

158 × 87 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Osmo 360 II

36 × 61 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R1

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R1

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Osmo 360 II: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R1Osmo 360 II
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
3.0Limited
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent
10.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
9.0Excellent✓ wins
6.0Good
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Travel
6.5Good
6.5Good
Wildlife
6.5Good
6.5Good
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
3.5Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R1

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 0 — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 157.6, 149.5, 87.3

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, CFexpress Type B

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    1330 shots vs 520 shots — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R1 supports it

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 51,200 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Osmo 360 II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human

  • Codecs

    Adds OSV, HEVC

  • Stabilization modes

    Adds RockSteady 3.0, HorizonSteady

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 36.3, 81, 61

  • Card types

    Adds microSD

  • Weight

    183 g vs 920 g — lower is better

  • Resolution

    120 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Burst (mechanical)Both 12 fps
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 120 fps
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R1

Pros

  • 40fps electronic burst
  • 24.2MP BSI stacked full-frame sensor
  • Dual Pixel Intelligent AF
  • 6K RAW and 4K 120p video
  • Dual CFexpress Type B slots

Cons

  • 24MP resolution
  • Very expensive
  • Large integrated-grip body

Osmo 360 II

Pros

  • Native 8K60 360 + SuperNight 2.0 at 8K60
  • 14.5-stop DR; 10-bit D-Log M
  • User-replaceable hard-coated lenses
  • 120MP HDR panoramas with RAW
  • 105GB built-in storage + NFC tap-to-connect

Cons

  • Single-lens max 4K (no 5K vs first-gen / X6)
  • 100 min 8K30 vs X6’s 140 min
  • 10m waterproof vs X6’s 20m
  • US MSRP/availability still catching China launch (¥3,299)

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R1 and Osmo 360 II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R1
Osmo 360 II
Resolution
24.2 MP
120 MP5× more
Sensor type
Full Frame BSI Stacked CMOS
Dual 1/1.1-inch square CMOS (1-inch equivalent 360)
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
1/1.1 inch
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R1
Osmo 360 II
Aperture
f/1.9
EOS R1
Osmo 360 II
Processor
DIGIC Accelerator + DIGIC X
High-performance ISP
EOS R1
Osmo 360 II
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
102,400+1 stop
51,200
ISO max (expanded)
409,600
51,200
EOS R1
Osmo 360 II
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/64000 sec
1/8000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, EOS R1 or Osmo 360 II?

EOS R1 scores 7.5/10 versus 3.0/10 for Osmo 360 II — 24.2MP — solid resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R1 and Osmo 360 II?

EOS R1 is 24.2 MP and Osmo 360 II is 120 MP, so the Osmo 360 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R1 and Osmo 360 II have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R1 has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while Osmo 360 II uses Electronic image stabilization (electronic).

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R1 or the Osmo 360 II?

EOS R1 reaches 40 fps electronic. Osmo 360 II reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R1 and Osmo 360 II?

EOS R1 weighs 920 g and Osmo 360 II weighs 183 g, so the Osmo 360 II is 737 g lighter.

Do the EOS R1 and Osmo 360 II record 4K video?

EOS R1: 6K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. Osmo 360 II: 8K 360 (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS R1 and Osmo 360 II weather sealed?

EOS R1: Yes. Osmo 360 II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 1,330 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R1 and 520 shots for the Osmo 360 II, giving the EOS R1 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R1 launched at $6,299 and Osmo 360 II at $599. The Osmo 360 II is $5,700 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R1 vs Osmo 360 II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed September 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and DJI press materials.