Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2022

vs
Osmo 360 II

DJI

Osmo 360 II

Second-gen 8K 360 director’s camera with dual 1/1.1-inch square sensors, native 8K60, 14.5-stop DR, SuperNight 2.0, user-replaceable lenses, 120MP RAW stills, NFC, and 105GB built-in storage.

$599

Launch price

Released Aug 2026

Osmo 360 II is 3.8 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

6categories

EOS R6 Mark II

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

4categories

Osmo 360 II

Sports & ActionTravel

3 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 2 categories·Osmo 360 II wins 3 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 0)
  • BOsmo 360 II has higher Resolution (120 MP vs 24.2 MP)
  • BOsmo 360 II has lower Weight (183 g vs 670 g)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 51,200)
  • BOsmo 360 II has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIOsmo 360 II
Resolution24.2 MP120 MP
SensorFull Frame1/1.1 inch
ISO max102,40051,200
Burst40 fps30 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBIS8-stopNo
Weight670 g183 g
Battery760 shots520 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Osmo 360 II front view

Osmo 360 II

36 × 81 × 61 mm

183 g (0.40 lb / 6.46 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 102mm wider, 17mm taller, and 27mm thicker than Osmo 360 II.

EOS R6 Mark II is 487 g heavier than Osmo 360 II.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 61mm Osmo 360 II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Osmo 360 II

36 × 81 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Osmo 360 II

36 × 61 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Osmo 360 II: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIOsmo 360 II
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
3.0Limited
Sports & Action
9.0Excellent
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
6.0Good
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Wildlife
6.5Good
6.5Good
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
3.5Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 0 — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 51,200 — higher is better

  • Eye AF

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

Reasons to choose

Osmo 360 II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human

  • Codecs

    Adds OSV, HEVC

  • Stabilization modes

    Adds RockSteady 3.0, HorizonSteady

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 36.3, 81, 61

  • Card types

    Adds microSD

  • Resolution

    120 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • Weight

    183 g vs 670 g — lower is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Burst (mechanical)Both 12 fps
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • IBIS effectivenessBoth 8 stops
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

Osmo 360 II

Pros

  • Native 8K60 360 + SuperNight 2.0 at 8K60
  • 14.5-stop DR; 10-bit D-Log M
  • User-replaceable hard-coated lenses
  • 120MP HDR panoramas with RAW
  • 105GB built-in storage + NFC tap-to-connect

Cons

  • Single-lens max 4K (no 5K vs first-gen / X6)
  • 100 min 8K30 vs X6’s 140 min
  • 10m waterproof vs X6’s 20m
  • US MSRP/availability still catching China launch (¥3,299)

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo 360 II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
Osmo 360 II
Resolution
24.2 MP
120 MP5× more
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Dual 1/1.1-inch square CMOS (1-inch equivalent 360)
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
1/1.1 inch
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark II
Osmo 360 II
Aperture
f/1.9
EOS R6 Mark II
Osmo 360 II
Processor
DIGIC X
High-performance ISP
EOS R6 Mark II
Osmo 360 II
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
102,400+1 stop
51,200
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
51,200
EOS R6 Mark II
Osmo 360 II
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/8000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, EOS R6 Mark II or Osmo 360 II?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 3.0/10 for Osmo 360 II — 24.2MP — solid resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo 360 II?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and Osmo 360 II is 120 MP, so the Osmo 360 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo 360 II have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while Osmo 360 II uses Electronic image stabilization (electronic).

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the Osmo 360 II?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. Osmo 360 II reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo 360 II?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and Osmo 360 II weighs 183 g, so the Osmo 360 II is 487 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo 360 II record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. Osmo 360 II: 8K 360 (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo 360 II weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. Osmo 360 II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 520 shots for the Osmo 360 II, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and Osmo 360 II at $599. The Osmo 360 II is $1,900 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs Osmo 360 II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed September 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and DJI press materials.