Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Canon

EOS-1D X Mark III

Canon flagship DSLR for sports and news with 20fps and legendary reliability.

$6,499

Released Feb 2020

vs
Alpha 7R VI

Sony

Alpha 7R VI

66.8MP fully-stacked full-frame high-resolution body with 30fps bursts, 8K 30p, 4K 120p, and Sony's new BIONZ XR2 engine.

$4,499

Released Jun 2026

Alpha 7R VI is 6.3 years newer.

Wins

2categories

EOS-1D X Mark III

WildlifeSports & Action

Wins

10categories

Alpha 7R VI

PortraitVideo & Hybrid

2 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS-1D X Mark III wins 1 categories·Alpha 7R VI wins 4 categories
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher AF points / zones (759 vs 191)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher Resolution (66.8 MP vs 20.1 MP)
  • AEOS-1D X Mark III has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 32,000)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS-1D X Mark IIIAlpha 7R VI
Resolution20.1 MP66.8 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max102,40032,000
Burst20 fps30 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBIS8-stopYes
Weight720 g713 g
Battery520 shots600 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS-1D X Mark III

138 × 98 × 88 mm

720 g (1.59 lb / 25.40 oz)

Alpha 7R VI front view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 97 × 83 mm

713 g (1.57 lb / 25.15 oz)

EOS-1D X Mark III is 5mm wider, 1mm taller, and 5mm thicker than Alpha 7R VI.

EOS-1D X Mark III is 7 g heavier than Alpha 7R VI.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS-1D X Mark III · 83mm Alpha 7R VI

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS-1D X Mark III

138 × 98 mm

Alpha 7R VI back view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 97 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS-1D X Mark III

138 × 88 mm

Alpha 7R VI top view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 83 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS-1D X Mark III

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Alpha 7R VI

35.9 × 24 mm · Full Frame

862 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS-1D X Mark III

Canon EF

300+

native lenses available

100 first-party200 third-party

Alpha 7R VI

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS-1D X Mark IIIAlpha 7R VI
Portrait
6.5Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
7.0Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
5.5Fair
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
6.0Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Wildlife
10.0Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Vlogging
5.5Fair
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS-1D X Mark III

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138, 98, 88

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 32,000 — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only EOS-1D X Mark III supports it

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only EOS-1D X Mark III supports it

  • Internal RAW video

    Only EOS-1D X Mark III supports it

  • Weather sealing

    Only EOS-1D X Mark III supports it

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7R VI

  • AF low-light limit

    -6 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 132.7, 96.9, 82.9

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A, SDXC UHS-II

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    759 vs 191 — higher is better

  • Resolution

    66.8 MP vs 20.1 MP — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

  • Animal / bird AF

    Only Alpha 7R VI supports it

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization
  • Card slotsBoth 2
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS-1D X Mark III

Pros

  • 20fps DSLR
  • Pro build
  • Dual CFexpress
  • Excellent AF

Cons

  • DSLR platform
  • 20MP
  • Very heavy

Alpha 7R VI

Pros

  • 66.8MP fully-stacked Exmor RS sensor
  • 30fps blackout-free electronic burst
  • 8K 30p and 4K 120p video
  • 8.5-stop in-body stabilization
  • 9.44M-dot HDR OLED EVF

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Large files demand fast cards and storage
  • 8K workflow can be heavy

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS-1D X Mark III
Alpha 7R VI
Resolution
20.1 MP
66.8 MP3.3× more
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full-Frame Stacked CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
35.9 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS-1D X Mark III
Alpha 7R VI
AF system
191-point phase-detect AF / Dual Pixel CMOS AF
Contrast Detection / Phase Detection
AF points / zones
191
7594× more
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-4 EV
-6 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
No
Yes
Subject recognition
Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle
Human, Animal, Bird, Eye, Insect, Vehicle
EOS-1D X Mark III
Alpha 7R VI
Burst (mechanical)
16 fps
Burst (electronic)
20 fps
30 fps+50%
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
RAW buffer depth
200 frames+33%
150 frames
EOS-1D X Mark III
Alpha 7R VI
Max resolution
5.5K RAW
8K
4K max frame rate
60 fps
120 fps2× more
Max video bit rate
150 Mbps
600 Mbps4× more
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log
S-Cinetone / S-Log3
Codecs
RAW, H.265, H.264
XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I, H.265, H.264
EOS-1D X Mark III
Alpha 7R VI
Weight
720 g
713 g−7 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138 × 98 × 88 mm
132.7 × 96.9 × 82.9 mm
Weather sealing
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, EOS-1D X Mark III or Alpha 7R VI?

EOS-1D X Mark III scores 10.0/10 versus 6.5/10 for Alpha 7R VI — 20fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS-1D X Mark III and Alpha 7R VI?

EOS-1D X Mark III is 20.1 MP and Alpha 7R VI is 66.8 MP, so the Alpha 7R VI captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS-1D X Mark III and Alpha 7R VI have in-body image stabilization?

EOS-1D X Mark III has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while alpha 7R VI has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS-1D X Mark III or the Alpha 7R VI?

EOS-1D X Mark III reaches 20 fps electronic. Alpha 7R VI reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS-1D X Mark III and Alpha 7R VI?

EOS-1D X Mark III weighs 720 g and Alpha 7R VI weighs 713 g, so the Alpha 7R VI is 7 g lighter.

Do the EOS-1D X Mark III and Alpha 7R VI record 4K video?

EOS-1D X Mark III: 4K up to 60p. Alpha 7R VI: 8K (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS-1D X Mark III and Alpha 7R VI weather sealed?

EOS-1D X Mark III: Yes. Alpha 7R VI: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the EOS-1D X Mark III and 600 shots for the Alpha 7R VI, giving the Alpha 7R VI the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS-1D X Mark III launched at $6,499 and Alpha 7R VI at $4,499. The Alpha 7R VI is $2,000 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.